On 08/04/2017 07:30 PM, Jordan Brown wrote:
>
> What I'm objecting to is the fact that it hunts down *other* instances
> of the address in From and removes them (or perhaps replaces them with
> the Reply-To and then eliminates duplicates). I think Reply-All should
> take {Reply-To, else From}, To
On 8/4/2017 2:32 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> My theory is that MS is (wrongly) dropping the "To" copy of list1 from
>> the reply because it's the From, and then (correctly) using the Reply-To
>> instead of the From.
> It looks to me as if your theory is correct, except I wouldn't say
> "wrongly". I t
On 08/04/2017 01:35 PM, Jordan Brown wrote:
> On 8/4/2017 12:51 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> I'm aware of issues with Microsoft services adding 'spoofing' warnings
>> to messages where the From: address and the To: address are the same.
>> Is this what you were referring to by "Setting it to the list
On 8/4/2017 12:51 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I'm aware of issues with Microsoft services adding 'spoofing' warnings
> to messages where the From: address and the To: address are the same.
> Is this what you were referring to by "Setting it to the list name
> interacts badly with outloook.com and hotm
On 08/04/2017 10:15 AM, Jordan Brown wrote:
> On 8/4/2017 8:24 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> On 08/03/2017 07:15 PM, Jordan Brown wrote:
>>> Is there a way to control the From value when it gets munged so we pass
>>> DMARC?
>> There's no configuration for it, but it's a simple patch.
>
> Thanks. Alas
On 8/4/2017 8:24 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 08/03/2017 07:15 PM, Jordan Brown wrote:
>> Is there a way to control the From value when it gets munged so we pass
>> DMARC?
> There's no configuration for it, but it's a simple patch.
Thanks. Alas, I'm a hosting-provider customer, not standalone, and
On 08/04/2017 06:46 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>
> Does anyone know the precise mechanisms that Thunderbird is using, and
> whether there is any way to overrite it so we can get the old behaviour back
> by using the reply function to reply to the list?
This is a Thunderbird "feature". It's stup
On 08/04/2017 07:52 AM, Adam Goldberg wrote:
> General Options, select "Munge From".
>
> [cid:image001.png@01D30D0F.C2588CD0]
Your screen shot was removed by content filtering, however a few comments:
It is usually preferable to use the more selective Privacy options... ->
Sender filters -> dma
General Options, select "Munge From".
[cid:image001.png@01D30D0F.C2588CD0]
Adam Goldberg
AGP, LLC
+1-202-507-9900
-Original Message-
From: Mailman-Users [mailto:mailman-users-bounces+adam=agp-llc@python.org]
On Behalf Of Jordan Brown
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 10:15 P
On 08/04/2017 07:46 AM, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
I am recently getting a lot of complaints from Thunderbird users
on several lists running on our Mailman 2.1.24 system that when they
press ctrl+r for reply, the reply goes to the individual sender and not
the list. Mailman is set to strip the Repl
On 08/03/2017 07:15 PM, Jordan Brown wrote:
> Is there a way to control the From value when it gets munged so we pass
> DMARC?
There's no configuration for it, but it's a simple patch. The exact
patch depends on what version you have. In Mailman 2.1.18, the code is
around line 133 and is
>
Is there a way to control the From value when it gets munged so we pass
DMARC?
Setting it to the list name interacts badly with outloook.com and
hotmail.com replies. Since the From address really isn't used (because
there's a Reply-To), it seems like it could be anything that's at the
host domain
Hi,
I am recently getting a lot of complaints from Thunderbird users on several
lists running on our Mailman 2.1.24 system that when they press ctrl+r for
reply, the reply goes to the individual sender and not the list. Mailman is
set to strip the Reply-To header and set replies to go to the l
Le 03/08/2017 à 17:09, Mark Sapiro a écrit :
> This was overkill. The underlying issue was that the list's
> 'description' attribute was encoded in a character set which was not
> that of the list's preferred language.
Thanks Mark. This will probably will be usefull for some more lists
because th
14 matches
Mail list logo
