On 08/18/2017 11:07 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
I second this. It is a legitimate part of compliant email addresses, no
matter how many web stores seem to believe otherwise (or are merely
unaware of it).
I third this.
I love user+detail but HATE that poorly designed web forms balk at +,
and
On 08/18/17 12:25, tlhackque via Mailman-Users wrote:
> On 17-Aug-17 16:47, Andy Cravens wrote:
>>
>>
>> David,
>>
>> I forgot to mention I’m also working on a modsecurity rule to look at all
>> POSTs
>> and reject if they contain an email address with a + sign.
>>
> I understand the drive to
On 17-Aug-17 16:47, Andy Cravens wrote:
>
>
> David,
>
> I forgot to mention I’m also working on a modsecurity rule to look at all
> POSTs
> and reject if they contain an email address with a + sign.
>
I understand the drive to suppress an attack. However, + is valid in
e-mail addresses. It's
On 8/17/17 3:47 PM, Andy Cravens wrote:
I forgot to mention I’m also working on a modsecurity rule to look at
all POSTs and reject if they contain an email address with a + sign.
I'm interested in both your recaptcha mod & mod_security rule ... please
post (or contact me privately) when you
