Re: [Mailman-Users] options for dealing with DMARC

2017-12-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 12/28/2017 03:48 PM, Jordan Brown wrote: > > On 12/28/2017 1:27 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> As pointed out in item 2 at >> ... > (In looking to see what else I might have missed, I found DEV/DMARC; you > might want to link the two together.) Actually,

Re: [Mailman-Users] options for dealing with DMARC

2017-12-28 Thread Jordan Brown
[ Mark, sorry for the dup.  Sent from the wrong address, so the copy to the mailing list bounced. ] On 12/28/2017 1:27 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 12/28/2017 11:57 AM, Jordan Brown wrote: >> That's leading me to wonder whether there's another way, whether I can >> leave From alone and still get pa

Re: [Mailman-Users] options for dealing with DMARC

2017-12-28 Thread Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users
On 12/28/2017 04:33 PM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote: Sending domain administrators can require that *both* SPF /and/ DKIM must pass for DMARC to pass.  So your /or/ premise is likely not going to work out as well as you had hoped. (*sigh* It's been a day.) As sure as I say that. I

Re: [Mailman-Users] options for dealing with DMARC

2017-12-28 Thread Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users
On 12/28/2017 12:57 PM, Jordan Brown wrote: Wikipedia tells me that DMARC passes if either SPF or DKIM passes. Sending domain administrators can require that *both* SPF /and/ DKIM must pass for DMARC to pass. So your /or/ premise is likely not going to work out as well as you had hoped.

Re: [Mailman-Users] options for dealing with DMARC

2017-12-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 12/28/2017 11:57 AM, Jordan Brown wrote: > > That's leading me to wonder whether there's another way, whether I can > leave From alone and still get past the DMARC checks.  Wikipedia tells > me that DMARC passes if either SPF *or* DKIM passes.  There's no hope > for SPF with the original sender

Re: [Mailman-Users] options for dealing with DMARC

2017-12-28 Thread Jordan Brown
[ Today is not my day for getting details right.  Sigh. ] On 12/28/2017 11:57 AM, Jordan Brown wrote: > I've been running my mailing list for a few years with "Munge From" to > defend against DMARC rejection.  This means that my messages get > > From: Joe User That should be From: Joe U

[Mailman-Users] options for dealing with DMARC

2017-12-28 Thread Jordan Brown
I've been running my mailing list for a few years with "Munge From" to defend against DMARC rejection.  This means that my messages get From: Joe User Reply-To: Joe User That mostly works, but sometimes confuses people a bit, and just now I've had somebody send what I think was intended

Re: [Mailman-Users] importing large (1GB) mbox file, hitting a wall here..

2017-12-28 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 12/27/2017 08:08 PM, Andrew White, PhD wrote: >I then ran bin/arch --wipe dbt-l_pdbti.org. When I >checked the archives, only about 11,000 messages were imported. I saw in >the arch help file there can be memory issues, and so to run things in >chunks. So, I did this: > >bi

[Mailman-Users] importing large (1GB) mbox file, hitting a wall here..

2017-12-28 Thread Andrew White, PhD
First post- thanks much for your archives, been getting myself up to speed today and I hope to be a member of the community who gives back as well. I took over a large mailing list with a 12 year archive, which is about a 1 GB .mbox file (about 35,000 messages). I need to upload it to