Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project (was: Handling Munged From Addresses)

2020-03-02 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 3/2/20 1:55 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > > There are plenty of people who are still happy with pipermail and some > of the other search options (Google, htdig, etc) What benefit does a > REST api provide to church groups, and tech lists like nanog or mailop? It provides a

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project

2020-03-02 Thread Brian Carpenter
On 3/2/20 4:55 PM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: While I applaud Brian's efforts, I'm not convinced that I would run PHP on a public facing portal, even in 2020. But that's just me, others may feel differently. And so it begins. -- Please let me know if you need further assistance.

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project (was: Handling Munged From Addresses)

2020-03-02 Thread Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 10:54 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 3/2/20 8:56 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > > > Barry's roadmap > > for Python2 -> Python3 seems to counter the narrative that MM2 is ill- > > advised to be ported to Python3 (btw, that was posted in Jan of this > > year). >

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project (was: Handling Munged From Addresses)

2020-03-02 Thread Dave Stevens
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:53:19 -0500 Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > but I have vague recollections that both Barry and Mark have > > said repeatedly that doing so would be substantially anything built on the > > MM2 > > architecture. assuming that's so I think the "anything built

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project (was: Handling Munged From Addresses)

2020-03-02 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 3/2/20 8:56 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > Barry's roadmap > for Python2 -> Python3 seems to counter the narrative that MM2 is ill- > advised to be ported to Python3 (btw, that was posted in Jan of this > year). The question is what do people want when they say they want

Re: [Mailman-Users] MM3 filter content

2020-03-02 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 3/2/20 12:35 AM, Eduardo Costa via Mailman-Users wrote: > Hello, > > How do I manage to activate and define the content filters in order to > remove attachments at MM3? The list for questions about Mailman 3 is mailman-us...@mailman3.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project (was: Handling Munged From Addresses)

2020-03-02 Thread Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users
On Mon, 2020-03-02 at 17:17 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes: > > > Interestingly enough, here's a roadmap on exactly how to do it: :) > > Jim, you're not helping. Stephen, thank you for taking the time to respond. Although I would have preferred

[Mailman-Users] MM3 filter content

2020-03-02 Thread Eduardo Costa via Mailman-Users
Hello, How do I manage to activate and define the content filters in order to remove attachments at MM3? Best Regards -- .. Eduardo Costa Centro de Comunicações - Instituto Politécnico de Bragança raposo at ipb.pt http://www.ipb.pt/~raposo/

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project (was: Handling Munged From Addresses)

2020-03-02 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes: > Interestingly enough, here's a roadmap on exactly how to do it: :) Jim, you're not helping. Until there are "I'll do it" hands up, no port to Python 3 that is faithful to current Mailman 2 is viable. Pushing it just serves to annoy those who are

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project

2020-03-02 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Mark Sapiro writes: > I'd say it depend on the details of how serious the vulnerability is, > how easy it is to exploit and how hard it is to fix. I am not opposed to > Mailman 2.1.30-x security fix releases. Mark speaks for me, although it's been a long time since I've worked on Mailman 2,