This is really useful information. Thanks very much!
Unfortunately I don't have shell access to my virtual server, or even access to
files outside of those for my webserver. I can't find the config.pck file
anywhere.
I used to run complete servers of various flavors, but the amount of that
Mark Sapiro writes:
> Actually, the first 2.1 release was in December, 2002. See
> https://wiki.list.org/DOC/7%20Mailman%20history
You would
You have to admit the early 2.1 release history is extremely
confusing. I'm pretty sure I chose the tag that was exactly "2.1".
---
On 7/5/23 7:51 PM, Charles Buckley wrote:
Heck, if I knew where the footer data was stored, I'd be happy to go in and
edit the file by hand, the web page be damned. I just want to get this
delivered and out of the way. Watch it probably be in some DB for which there
was never any compelling
It is disturbing that they don't keep up, but they're in Austria (or maybe
Switzerland). People are conservative there, because they have elaborate
acceptance criteria.
I once had a customer go live with a national regulated server running on a
beta version of Java Server Pages, and leave th
Answer I can provide that usefully add value are listed below:
I actually precisely wrote what I did. I started reverse engineering how to
solve the problem, using my other two preexisting lists. One was already
'public' (meaning browsable). Since I could delete the footer on that one
withou
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Charles Buckley writes:
> > I saw a report of this behaviour on this mailing list from the year
> > 2000.
> If you have an URL for this post, or a timestamp, or even a precise
> date, it might be helpful. I can't find it.
It's https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman
On 7/5/2023 12:54 PM, Charles Buckley wrote:
My server is one of those shared servers, to which I do not have shell
access. Mailman would have to be reinstalled by the sysadmins -- I
can't do it. I have involved them, but they're still coming up to
speed.
That in itself is a trifle worrying-- a
On 7/5/23 1:27 AM, Charles Buckley wrote:
I experimented with this a bit, and found that I could eliminate the footer on
my public (browsable) list on the same server. So I tried converting my other
private (non-browsable) list to be browsable, at which point I could eliminate
the footer, and
Hello,
Thanks for answering.
If the first private list I could successfully change by making it non-private
also behaved as the 'recalcitrant list' before I did so, then I would suggest
that it's a mailman issue.
My server is one of those shared servers, to which I do not have shell access
Charles Buckley writes:
> I experimented with this a bit, and found that I could eliminate
> the footer on my public (browsable) list on the same server. So I
> tried converting my other private (non-browsable) list to be
> browsable, at which point I could eliminate the footer, and then
> sw
On 7/5/2023 1:27 AM, Charles Buckley wrote:
Any advice would be appreciated.
My first advice would be to upgrade to the current 2.1 mailman (.39?) and
try it again; 2.15 is -really- old and this behavior may be due to a bug
that's been fixed.
z!
I run three Mailman lists on my web server, one browsable and two
non-browsable. I wanted to eliminate the footer that gets added to the bottom
of messages distributed by one of the private (non-browsable) lists.
When I tried to do this, I would browse to the admin non-digest page, delete
the c
12 matches
Mail list logo
