RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

2002-05-06 Thread Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS
-Original Message- > From: Ron Jarrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:41 AM > To: Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS > Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman > > > At 10:18 AM 5/6/02 -0500, Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS

RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

2002-05-06 Thread Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS
locally... Eric > -Original Message- > From: Graham TerMarsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:27 PM > To: Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman > &

RE: [Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

2002-05-03 Thread Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS
ow, if I use the box as a relay, or a local mail, the message is immediately sent and delivered.  So it seems to be something related to Mailman. Eric -Original Message-From: Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:31 AMTo: '

[Mailman-Users] Sendmail Performance with mailman

2002-05-03 Thread Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS
Title: Sendmail Performance with mailman I have had an ongoing problem with qrunner being extremely slow, so I tried some of the suggestions in the faq. I made the following changes: I added the followind to my sendmail startup     /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \   

RE: [Mailman-Users] Attachments in archive

2002-05-02 Thread Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS
Title: RE: [Mailman-Users] Attachments in archive There isn't anything about this in the FAQ. Eric > -Original Message- > From: J C Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:21 AM > To: Rantanen, TC1 > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] A

RE: [Mailman-Users] Attachments in archive

2002-05-02 Thread Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS
Title: RE: [Mailman-Users] Attachments in archive This also interests me.  What would be nice would be if the attachment could be stripped, then added to a file download section of the archive. Eric > -Original Message- > From: Rantanen, TC1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursd

[Mailman-Users] Webshield bombs sending to Mailman

2002-04-30 Thread Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS
Title: Webshield bombs sending to Mailman Anyone have any idea what could be causing this:  -Original Message- From:   Webshield SMTP V4.5 MR1a Mail Service [mailto:Webshield SMTP V4.5 MR1a Mail Service] Sent:   Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:   

RE: [Mailman-Users] Long delay for qrunner ?

2002-04-26 Thread Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS
Title: RE: [Mailman-Users] Long delay for qrunner ? Ok, I am also seeing that problem, below is an excerpt from the faq.  I am using sendmail for my MTA, how would I turn this off on my box? I looked in README.SENDMAIL and it didn't address it. Eric Q. I'm getting really terrible performan

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman messages getting rejected by Exchange relays running Webs hield

2002-04-23 Thread Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS
Title: Mailman messages getting rejected by Exchange relays running Webshield Problem solved, the FQDN did not have an MX record associated with it.  Thanks Eric B. -Original Message-From: Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, April 23

[Mailman-Users] Mailman messages getting rejected by Exchange relays running Webshield

2002-04-23 Thread Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS
Title: Mailman messages getting rejected by Exchange relays running Webshield All, I have set up mailman running on Slackware 8.0 w/ the latest slackware sendmail patches.  Some of the list subscribers are having mail addressed to the list bounced by Exchange servers running Webshield SMTP V4