[Mailman-Users] Digest Setting in 2.0.13

2003-06-21 Thread Customer & Technical Support
How can I reset the digest in version 2.0.13 to Volume 1, Number 1 and then later how do I increment the Volume number when I want to go to Volume 2, etc? Thanks, DB -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailma

[Mailman-Users] Digest Question...

2003-07-11 Thread Customer & Technical Support
Hello all... I finally got lucky enough to get MM 2.1.2 installed on my server. I like it a LOT better than the 2.0.13 version. It has all of the features I wanted added in. However it does one thing I don't like at all... In the digest version of the list I get a link after a lot of messag

Re: [Mailman-Users] Digest Question...

2003-07-12 Thread Customer & Technical Support
tomer & Technical Support wrote: > I searched the archive and saw one thread about this. The 'fix' was > to turn of the plain (vs MIME) for digest. That (IMHO) is not a fix but > a work around. I want to keep plain format and not add the two lines > listed a

[Mailman-Users] Digest From Address...

2003-07-12 Thread Customer & Technical Support
I just noticed that the digest version of my list is being addressed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] That is a pretty strange address to use as a send address. Is this standard? -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/

[Mailman-Users] 2.1.2 Questions

2003-07-13 Thread Customer & Technical Support
I am using 2.1.2 after coming from 2.0.13. I like a lot the new options that were set 'features' in the older version. However the programmers added a LOT more of the same old type of 'features' in the 2.1.2 version and have not allowed for optioning them out. I'll try to describe as best I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Upgraded then ... "Too many recipients tothe message."

2003-07-14 Thread Customer & Technical Support
That parameter is described and coded poorly. It is extremely misleading. The number that one SHOULD have to put in there is the max number of address allowed. However the number you need to enter is one number MORE THAN that number. Max addresses should be max addresses! It is ver

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer message in html email

2003-07-15 Thread Customer & Technical Support
HTML in email sucks. If I want to see a damn web page I'll go to the URL. Most people use HTML to dress up spam or otherwise hide the fact that they had nothing worthwhile to say anyway. I filter ALL HTML out of any mail I get. Its extremely unprofessional to use. At 07:17 PM 7/15

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer message in html email

2003-07-15 Thread Customer & Technical Support
idth and spam > and junk mail filter performance with mail tarted up using HTML is not > justified. > > HMTL email is for the most part, like much HTML markup on web pages, a > triumph of form over content. > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Cust

[Mailman-Users] Making Real Name and Password required.

2003-09-04 Thread Customer & Technical Support
Is there a way to set up MM so that the Real Name and password are required fields? -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Sea