On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> David Lee wrote:
> >
> >(This is in relation to 2.0.9, but I would probably move to 2.1.11.)
> >
> >I've been reading FAQ 4.75 ("How do I set up ... to load-balance ...") and
> >Barry's archived em
es; similarly that failback (whether
manual or automatic) after recovery would revert to "only my slices"
operation.
Has this been written up anywhere? If not, I'd be happy to keep notes of
the process and submit them back to the Mailman documentation if that
would help.
Thanks.
--
it a.s.a.p. in our service
environments (i.e. not Mailman 3) would be able to contribute to building
it, perhaps as a subproject (analogous to those you mention for
"SQAlchemy/Elixir", archiver, "web u/i", etc.).
Anyway, thanks for your work over the years,and now o
HTML version where it could persist.
endif
For lists on which body-based "Approved" and HTML-ising senders are
likely, it is worth investigating the "collapse_alternatives" and
"convert_html_to_plaintext" settings.
(I'm willing to be corrected on any of
fering multiple, logically independent domains.
Put another way: at a single domain site, the uniqueness of "listname" and
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" are equivalent. At a multi-domain site (e.g. a
multi-domain ISP-like body offering maillist services), the uniqueness
c
, is that Exchange assumes the
"Message-ID" is unique and so discards duplicates. This uniqueness
assumption for email is generally fine. But in the case of an email going
through more than one list, with recipients in common, I think it would no
longer be valid.)
Hope that helps. (You
ate:"? And the CST/CDT issue would automatically be OK.
(For those who like choice, there could be a Mailman-admin option of which
date (email "Date:" or server arrival-time (or ...?)) to use. And for
those who really like choice, that could even have a per-list option.)
Just a thou
for each (possibly only one depending on other
> settings) SMTP transaction. After editing the file, you need to do
> 'bin/mailmanctl restart' to load the changed module.
Done (edit and 'bin/mailmanctl restart'). I think I got it right!
I'll await the next em
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> David Lee wrote:
> >
> >System:
> > Fedora Core 5
> > Mailman 2.1.8 (RPM: mailman-2.1.8-0.FC5.1)
> > sendmail 8.13.6 (RPM: sendmail-8.13.6-0.FC5.1)
> >
> >
> >On the test list for our staff (89
if that
really were relevant, then I would expect it to be consistent for all the
mails to the list, not just some of them.
Any ideas?
--
: David LeeI.T. Service :
: Senior Systems ProgrammerComputer Centre :
:
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Bryan Carbonnell wrote:
> On 5/15/06, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > o "corporate branding" of Mailman pages.
>
> I have posted a patch,# 1415956, on Sourceforge
> (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 10:01 AM +0100 2006-05-15, David Lee wrote:
>
> >Is there a facility, or
> > plans for such, for each permitted sender to have (optionally) their own
> > password, u
rk would need to be on something reasonably active with a
realistic release schedule (we once, many years back, began doing things
in Majordomo-2 only for that to stall and stall...).
--
: David LeeI.T. Service :
: Senior
e
significantly worse problems/weaknesses than existing mechanisms)?
Comments?
If it is possible now (i.e. I have overlooked the relevant documentation),
please point me in the correct direction, to documentation etc.
If not yet possible, but acceptable in theory (perhaps with amendments),
then we would hop
14 matches
Mail list logo
