Re: [Mailman-Users] multiple header_filter_rules?

2007-06-03 Thread David R Bosso
--On Friday, June 1, 2007 11:32 AM -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David R Bosso wrote: >> --On May 22, 2007 4:53:05 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> David R Bosso wrote: >>>> >>>> I have 2 rules s

Re: [Mailman-Users] multiple header_filter_rules?

2007-05-23 Thread David R Bosso
--On May 22, 2007 4:53:05 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David R Bosso wrote: >> >> I have 2 rules set up. For a given test message, Rule 1 does not match, >> and Rule 2 does. If I have Rule 1 set to discard, and Rule 2 set to >> Hold, the

[Mailman-Users] multiple header_filter_rules?

2007-05-22 Thread David R Bosso
Howdy, I'm seeing the following oddity with header_filter_rules. I have 2 rules set up. For a given test message, Rule 1 does not match, and Rule 2 does. If I have Rule 1 set to discard, and Rule 2 set to Hold, the message is discarded. If I make the single change of setting Rule 2 to Defer,

[Mailman-Users] "ordinal not in range" shunted messages?

2005-08-19 Thread David R Bosso
I'm getting a lot of shunted messages that leave the following in the error log: - Aug 19 15:12:12 2005 (19781) Uncaught runner exception: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe1 in position 3: ordinal not in range(128) Aug 19 15:12:12 2005 (19781) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/u