Re: [Mailman-Users] Missing Unsubscription Requests

On Friday 28 April 2006 21:55, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Edward Muller wrote: > >I know the unsubscription request was made because: > >a) they show up in the 'vette' log > >b) Some people are sending angry emails to the return address of the list. > > a) is goo

[Mailman-Users] Missing Unsubscription Requests

iption requests don't show up on the 'admindb' page. I don't mean that all unsubscription requests don't show up, some do. I've looked over the error logs, which do have some errors, but nothing related to unsubscription requests.

[Mailman-Users] Is there a no-password no-corfirmation unsubscribe option anywhere?

Is there a no-password, no confirmation unsubscribe option anywhere in Mailman? I have a client that wants this despite my protests. Apparently since we put Mailman in place he is getting a lot of complaints (and rude comments) about their unsubscription process. -- Edward Muller - Interlix

Re: [Mailman-Users] 500 Internal Server Erro r with edithtml (butnotadmin, admind b and the rest)

On Tuesday 07 February 2006 05:44 pm, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > Edward Muller wrote: > > I reviewed the patch a bit and it looks reasonable to apply, so I applied > > it. > > > > However edithtml/traffic (traffic being the name of the list) still > > returns a 500

Re: [Mailman-Users] 500 Internal Server Error with edithtml (butnotadmin, admindb and the rest)

On Tuesday 07 February 2006 07:05 pm, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Edward Muller wrote: > >I reviewed the patch a bit and it looks reasonable to apply, so I applied > > it. > > > >However edithtml/traffic (traffic being the name of the list) still > > returns a 500 error

Re: [Mailman-Users] 500 Internal Server Error with edithtml (butnotadmin, admindb and the rest)

, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Edward Muller wrote: > >So which part of this patch fixes the problem I'm getting? > > The part that adds > > import re > > to Mailman/Cgi/edithtml.py > > But you may run into one of the other bugs sooner or later, so why not > ap

Re: [Mailman-Users] 500 Internal Server Erro r with edithtml (but not admin , adm indb and the rest)

So which part of this patch fixes the problem I'm getting? On Tuesday 07 February 2006 03:05 pm, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > Hi, > > Edward Muller wrote: > > I setup mailman for a customer of ours and when they try to use edithtml > > they get a 500 Internal Server Err

Re: [Mailman-Users] 500 Internal Server Error with edithtml (butnotadmin, admindb and the rest)

n/edithtml/traffic>. The former > gives me the "List name is required." response as expected. Only the > latter gives the server error, so in this case I expect that there > will be something meaningful in Mailman's error log. > > -- > Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED

[Mailman-Users] 500 Internal Server Error with edithtml (but not admin, admindb and the rest)

ission2007.org/mailman/listinfo/traffic http://www.mission2007.org/mailman/admin/traffic http://www.mission2007.org/mailman/admindb/traffic etc.. How can I debug this? -- Edward Muller - Interlix [EMAIL PROTECTED] 417-862-0573 PGP Key: http://interlix.com/Members/edwardam/pgpkeys pgpKEyc

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman stopped working after /var got trashed

I figured it out about 10 minutes after I posted to the list. Thanks thought! On 25 May 2001 20:52:56 +0530, Satya wrote: > On May 25, 2001 at 09:00, Edward Muller wrote: > > >One of our severs' got their /var partition trashed (hd died). I > >re-contructed it by hand

[Mailman-Users] mailman stopped working after /var got trashed

One of our severs' got their /var partition trashed (hd died). I re-contructed it by hand (dns, logs, spool files, etc), but now mailman doesn't seem to be working. Sendmail works (I sent this mail through that server) and sendmail does receive the mail (I can see it calling wrapper in the sendma