Charles Marcus wrote:
> I'm confused... above you say that they don't allow relaying from
> outside their network 'no matter what'... then you say you need their
> relay service while outside their IP block...
>
The ISP and the third-party relayer are two different companies. I need
the rela
Charles Marcus wrote:
> Most ISPs in the US simply allow relaying on their IP blocks...
>
> But, they don't absolutely need to support *secure* smtp auth - basic
> smtp auth would be much better than using and easily forged 'From:'
> header...
>
> I'd find another ISP/3rd party relay service...
>
Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 3/17/2008, Frank Griffin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> My test machines all use a third-party relay server which requires
>> "From:" to be one of a fixed set of pre-registered values. I handle
>> this by using Postfix's
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> But here's the thing: the only occurrence of
>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" on the fresh system is a .forward file in
>> /root, /var/spool/postfix, and /home/ftg. The test message is sent from
>> the 'ftg' ID whose home directory is /home/ftg.
>>
>> Do you guys follow or look at .for
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> It appears non-standard in at least a few obvious ways, and I have no
> way to know in what others. You might find answers using Mandriva
> support resources
>
>
I did before posting here, but found no bug reports there or on Google
which resembled this in any way.
There'
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Frank Griffin wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>> It wasn't the addition of [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the reply-to that made
>> me curious (I can see that this list does that as well), but the fact
>> that the second entry has t
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Frank Griffin wrote:
>
>
>> Addenda: I set up a new list on the same host with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> as the owner and as a subscriber, and sent a post from
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the list.
>>
>> When [EMAIL PROTECTED] received
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> I'm not sure what's happening in total, but the '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is
> your own Reply-To: from the incoming post. The default is to add any
> additional reply-to address to that. If you want it removed, you need
> to set first_strip_reply_to to Yes.
>
> As far as the rest of
Frank Griffin wrote:
>
> In this case, the list owner is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the
> poster is [EMAIL PROTECTED] . It seems to me that this ought to be
> WebData Project Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .
>
> Did I miss a step ? What can I do to correct this ?
Addenda: I
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Frank Griffin wrote:
>> According to the UPGRADE document, file formats have changed as have
>> actual files (some new, some gone). What triggers the 2.1 version to do
>> the necessary conversions ? Is it just finding files of the old version
>> a
Hi all,
I need to migrate lists from an *old* Slackware system running MM 2.0
(0x20f0) to a new system where MM is installed via RPM (2.1.9).
I've read the posts linked to by the FAQ, and the basic procedure is to
copy the data, lists, and archives directories and run withlist
fix_url. But I
11 matches
Mail list logo
