On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:54, Tom Neff wrote:
I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
this is one of their we don't think you should WANT to do this
hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue
Well, if mailman did
On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 19:27, Dan Mick wrote:
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 15:54, Tom Neff wrote:
I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
this is one of their we don't think you should WANT to do this
hot-buttons, like controlling the List-*
Hi folks! I've been doing some poking around, trying to figure out some
more of the intricacies of nested-lists. According to the way that I'm
reading RFC 2369's section on Supporting Nested Lists, whether or not
List-Post is re-written should be configurable.
My current configuration has a
Hi folks! I've got mailman throwing up the we've hit a bug page on a
set of archives for me pretty consistently. The python traceback says
something about OverflowError: integer multiplication (I've included
the whole output below). It's showing up in gzip.py, but these archives
aren't
I've been running mailman on my servers for a while, and letting other
people run the mailing lists, but just recently I ended up starting a
list which I need to run. I've seen this administrivia option quite a
few times, and thought oh, that's cool, I don't have to worry about
silly people
On 09 Feb 2001 20:25:28 +0530, Satya wrote:
On Feb 9, 2001 at 06:39, Travis Llewellyn wrote:
One thing that some of you running Redhat 7.0 may want to look at when
compiling Mailman is setting CC to kgcc instead of gcc. When I compile
mailman with gcc that is included with Redhat 7.0 it had
