Is there a way to allow attachments of text/plain without them being added
inline in the message post? Would it be possible to have the mailman archive
split out the attachment and, for each message, provide a separate link to
download the attachment as a separate file?
I am running mailman 2.1.5 with SA 3.0.4 on FC3. While I am now properly
tagging the mails for spam there is no reason that they should be archived
along with valid posts. Is there a way to disable this based on header
information or some other criteria?
Thank you,
Jeff D
---
Hello,
I was curious if there is some sort of mechanism in mailman 2.1.5 to reverse
lookup (?) the poster via some sort of ORBS type database without manually
blacklisting all the different addresses that are out there. Any help or
leads to documentation would be helpful.
Currently running sendm
for
a quick way to unclutter my inbox.
Thank you,
Jeff D
On 3/5/06, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 5:52 PM -0600 2006-03-05, Jeff DeReus wrote:
>
> > I was curious if there is some sort of mechanism in mailman 2.1.5 to
> reverse
> > lookup (?) the pos
Hello,
I am running mailman 2.1.5 with sendmail. One of my users sent in an
attachment with a message to the list. When he signs with his PGP key, only
the PGP signature remains in the message. I have yet to locate the rest of
the message. It is necessary to disable the signature to allow his p
The poster uses an OpenPGP/MIME signature.
the pass_mime_types ==
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain
Thank you,
Jeff D
On 5/17/06, Todd Zullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeff DeReus wrote:
> >
.bin
<http://www.cactuscode.org/pipermail/developers/attachments/20060510/529c55f0/PGP.bin>
However, viewing the list mbox file the full message with the attachment
?flattened? is there.
Thank you,
Jeff D
On 5/17/06, Todd Zullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAG
On 5/17/06, Todd Zullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeff DeReus wrote:
> > Unfortunately filter_content was not set to yes. I am assuming that
> > would be fairly "handy".
>
> I'm not
It seems that adding the filter_types has one effect. When the list
subscribers get a message that has been PGP signed, the signature is no
longer valid.
When a patch is submitted (for developers) it is stripped from the message
that is posted to one list and the entire message with the patch is
All,
I am interested in copying my entire mailman installation over to another
machine to act as a mirror server in order to attempt an upgrade without the
risk of breaking my current installation. Is there one certain directory
path that I would have to move over in order to attempt this? or, ca
Hello again,
currently running mailman 2.1.5 on FC3 with sendmail and apache. doing a
test configure and install on a copy of my current mailing list
configuration. I am getting the error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bin/update", line 50, in ?
from Mailman import Utils
File "/
i have recently upgraded to version 2.1.8. messages are not being archived
for the month of june. archiving options are set properly in the
interface. the archive.mbox is there but when i run the arch script, it
says that the html is being formatted but still no entry for june is
visible. the m
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jeff DeReus wrote:
>
> >i have recently upgraded to version 2.1.8. messages are not being
> archived
> >for the month of june. archiving options are set properly in the
> >interface. the archive.mbox is there but when i run the a
and there are no entries in the shunt queue. here is the error log entry
File "/usr/local/mailman/pythonlib/email/__init__.py", line 51, in
message_from_string
return Parser(_class, strict=strict).parsestr(s)
File "/usr/local/mailman/pythonlib/email/Parser.py", line 75, in parsestr
re
On 6/23/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jeff DeReus wrote:
> >
> >the june
> >directory exists yet on the interface nothing shows.
>
>
> This is most likely due to old pages being cached in your web browser
> or a proxy somewhere, or possibl
On 6/23/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jeff DeReus wrote:
> >
> >yet when i did the upgrade I copied all of the archives and placed them
> in
> >the proper spot. all other lists archive their posts correctly.
> >suggestions as to how to
On 6/23/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jeff DeReus wrote:
> >
> >On 6/23/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> cat archives/private//index.html
> >>
> >> is there an entry for June 2006?
> >>
17 matches
Mail list logo
