Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

2004-02-08 Thread John Buttery
* Buddy Logan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-08 03:15:46 -0800]: > Since this is a pet peeve of yours, maybe you should explain to me > what is wrong with overwriting the "reply to" header. Well, OK...where to start? I guess a little background is in order. Basically, the idea is that every email

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

2004-02-08 Thread John Buttery
* Paul H Byerly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-05 12:27:00 -0600]: > Mailman does not destroy the original senders identify or e-mail, so > this part of the argument is moot. OK, I promise this will be my last post on this topic unless someone posts to me by name in non-quoted text, but I just had

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

2004-02-08 Thread John Buttery
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-05 20:02:46 +0200]: > http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml I've read that before; doesn't change the fact that arbitrarily overwriting the Reply-To: header destroys information. > A good portion of my members (mostly newbies) use various web-based

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reply to list

2004-02-05 Thread John Buttery
* Mark Dadgar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-04 22:55:55 -0800]: > This is totally ridiculous. > > The document you reference is a long attempt at rationalizing why we > shouldn't bother to try to make mail systems Do The Right Thing. > > The tool should fit the job and not the other way around. I

Re: [Mailman-Users] UnpicklingError: could not find MARK???

2003-06-06 Thread John Buttery
* Mike Alberghini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-06-05 11:12:58 -0400]: > UnpicklingError: could not find MARK Yeah, I get that error all the time...you have to make sure you steep the hard drive in vinegar for at least 6 hours before setting up a new mailing list. -- John# Butt

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTDIG patches reprieved (was HTDIG patches!Arghh!)

2003-06-06 Thread John Buttery
* Colin Mackinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-06-05 23:05:02 +0100]: > I am continually impressed by the number of websites I visit that run > mailman and I know that lots of them use your patch. Thank you for > re-thinking and I do hope that it becomes fully integrated into a future > release to sav

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman Security.

2003-02-05 Thread John Buttery
; Would closing the anon. ftp service stop mailman working in anyway, or > dya reckon he got in some place else? I don't see why stopping an ftpd would affect mailman... -- -------- John Buttery

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman feature request

2003-01-23 Thread John Buttery
MAIL PROTECTED] (among other text) -- -------- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable)

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Problems with content filtering

2003-01-20 Thread John Buttery
someone tells me whether it's expected behaviour or not... :) -- -------- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable) --

Re: [Mailman-Users] a basic question

2003-01-17 Thread John Buttery
ot officially from me. :) -- -------- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable) --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re:3rd time lucky

2003-01-11 Thread John Buttery
Mailman has a date? :) -- ---- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable) msg14406/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Every day

2003-01-08 Thread John Buttery
generating the error message, right? -- -------- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable) msg14288/pgp

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain HOW TO/FAQ/support

2002-12-17 Thread John Buttery
s hostname, but I didn't have to do any fancy footwork with it or the MTA... -- ---- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable) --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with SunOs

2002-12-17 Thread John Buttery
3) and now MPlayer installation troubles? No point, just wanted to point out that normally high-s/n-ratio list is having a bit of a surreal day. :) -- -------- John Buttery (Web page temp

Re: [Mailman-Users] header intact

2002-12-17 Thread John Buttery
o OP for the joke at its expense :p). -- -------- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable) msg13817/pgp0.pgp De

Re: [Mailman-Users] Virtual domain HOW TO/FAQ/support

2002-12-17 Thread John Buttery
7;s asking about the email as it displays on the web pages; wouldn't this be a Mailman config issue rather than an MTA issue? -- -------- John Buttery (Web pag

Re: [Mailman-Users] how to accept posts from everyone?

2002-12-12 Thread John Buttery
n, ALL legit email is coming from the same place.) Why don't you just get your users to subscribe themselves to the original list? -- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable

Re: [Mailman-Users] how to accept posts from everyone?

2002-12-12 Thread John Buttery
Not to be a sourpuss, but every mailing list I've ever been on that did that, I unsubscribed from due to spam and viral attachments eventually. Just FYI...be careful. -- ---- John Buttery (We

Re: [Mailman-Users] Only request alerts

2002-12-03 Thread John Buttery
ys are planning ahead! :p -- -------- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable) msg13589/pgp0.pgp Description

Re: [Mailman-Users] Eliminating access to the webinterface/unsubscribing

2002-11-20 Thread John Buttery
cribed. So therefore, wouldn't it make sense that the consequences of breaking the rule of said authorization be the only restriction you'd need? To put it in English, "Unsubscribe from this staff list and you're fired." :p -- ----

Re: [Mailman-Users] Migration questions (majordomo, MHonArc,Yahoo!Groups)

2002-11-19 Thread John Buttery
* Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-18 15:58:37 -0500]: > (though MHonArch may one day be the archiver that is included with > Mailman...) For the record, I second that hope... :) -- ----

Re: [Mailman-Users] Carriage Return in Archives

2002-11-12 Thread John Buttery
to unbreak the MUA and/or its user. -- -------- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable) msg13196/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: personalization features (was Re: Archive URLin postings (2.1b3))

2002-11-06 Thread John Buttery
never let that stop me before... :p Personally, "Yes" is the setting that I would expect to denote the fullest setting, if it appeared at all. However, I wouldn't really expect it to appear. If I were going to do it, I would use "None", "Body Only", and

Re: [Mailman-Users] archive stats

2002-09-03 Thread John Buttery
may want to look into something that can work on a Pipermail archive; also, on the archive page for my list (and I assume yours as well) there is a link where you can download a full archive of every post ever sent to the list, which should be parseable by anything that speaks mbox. -- [EMAIL

[Mailman-Users] Postings arrive with incorrect "To:" field (Take 2)

2002-08-22 Thread John Buttery
like the issue is with mailman. I have configured DEFAULT_HOST_NAME and also went into the web interface and set "Hostname this list prefers", but it still happens. What else can I configure and/or check to debug? -- --------

[Mailman-Users] Postings arrive with incorrect "To:" field

2002-08-22 Thread John Buttery
ilman. I have configured DEFAULT_HOST_NAME and also went into the web interface and set "Hostname this list prefers", but it still happens. What else can I configure and/or check to debug? -- -------- John Buttery The