Re: [Mailman-Users] [Mailman-Developers] Sender field

2006-05-01 Thread Neal Groothuis
I'd like to work up an unofficial diff to Mailman 2.1 for people like Stephen who are willing to give it a try on a live site. I'm not sure this is even necessary. Ezmlm doesn't touch the Sender: header at all, Majordomo sets it to the owner of the list, and (AFAICT) Listserv sets it to the

Re: [Mailman-Users] [Mailman-Developers] Sender field

2006-04-28 Thread Neal Groothuis
John W. Baxter wrote: Probably, indeed. But what happens if that header was already "taken" in the process that brought the message to mailman for distribution to the list? As I noted in my previous response, I believe that the correct field (if Mailman were to add a "Sender:" header) to add

Re: [Mailman-Users] Sender field

2006-04-28 Thread Neal Groothuis
It does not appear that Mailman modifies the "Sender:" field to comply with RFC 2822. The list-bounces address is not the mailbox of the agent responsible for transmitting the message, as required in section 3.6.2. The mailbox of the agent responsible for the transmission of the message would

[Mailman-Users] Sender field

2006-04-27 Thread Neal Groothuis
To reopen an old discussion: I would like to request that a feature be added in the next version of Mailman to allow a list administrator to disable rewriting of the "Sender:" header, or (better) for this behavior to be eliminated from Mailman altogether. Rationale: - Outlook treats the Sender