Hello,
I have one user who can't subscribe. He did the first step, and the subscribe
log lists him as pending. He has not received the conformation email.
His webserver is on a dynamic DNS system. He can receive mail to his host from
everyone except Mailman lists. (Verified with a SF list.)
Ahmad,
Mailman is a mailinglist management program. It is not a mass mailer.
It is designed to allow a large number of users to mail each other,
not for a single person to mail a lot of people. For instantce, a
bunch of people taking the same programming class might have a list,
or a bunch of
Is it possible that a knowledgeable System Admin, who is running
postfix/Mailman, would take pity on a new user and share an
example of what the permissions should look like for the various
directories?
I don't run postfix, but a quick google turned up the manpage which
indicates that you
Hi,
Hi, Shannon.
My name is Shannon McCormick and I am a member of the technology
team @ 4charity http://www.4charity.com. We are an Application
Service Provider (ASP) for the Non-Profit industry. We are
currently developing a Email List Management product that we will
make available to
Let me start this by saying that I am not a developer, I don't know
any of the developers, and I have no personal interest in this whole
thing.
I am sure that there are people on this list who's methods of personal
interaction are distasteful to some others on the list. I think that
this has
It might be better just to have your MTA strip attachmnets on incoming
messages to the list, before Mailman ever sees them.
This will probably be easier to manage. For instance, your message
would have been blocked if this list was set up to block messages with
attachments, but if the MTA at
This ties in nicely with a question that I asked earlier.
Is there a way to configure Mailman so that subscribers do not need
approval, but non-subscribers do?
Do you think we can fix this, or everyone is going
to be unsubscribing to avoid the spam ...
TO BE REMOVED FROM
I would like to point out while GAP is "source available" and
therefore might be reasonably called "open source" it is NOT "Open
Source" (as defined at http://www.opensource.org/osd.html) and is most
certainly not Free Software.
I write this not out of some sort of license zealotry, but this
I would like to configure a list so that members post directly, but
non-members require approval.
I really don't want to have to constantly keep a list of all of the
member is the "don't need approval" list.
I'm sorry if I am just missing the option for this or if it is
answered elseware.