Perhaps I'm being a bit over dramatic, but it does, in my mind, describe
what you seem to be doing, You come in and say that the list software
isn't working the way you would prefer, but for this conversation,
everyone else needs to change how they use the list so you can
> [...]
You are bein
Except then you run into ethical issues and possible legal violations of
emailing people who have not opted-n to receive the email.
This is becoming tiresome...
When you e-mail or subscribe to a mailing list, you are opting in to receive e-mail. If you participate in a topic/subject/thread,
> [...]
I will ask you how much you are willing to talk to a person who
basically interrupts, says they aren't really interested in the general
conversation, so isn't really listening, but if you go out of your way
to answer in a special way they will hear you. (Which is one way to
describe wha
> [...]
If you have no connection to them, but post to the list for
your own benefit, that is called "spam". It is generally considered
somewhere between rude and criminal.
> [...]
Your comments are surprisingly unfair for someone in a mailing list for mailing
list software.
Let's take me
> [...]
I think you are talking here about a web forum, where you can "subscribe"
to information posted to a certain thread. I never saw this in a real mailing
list.
I Cc: this reply to you to make sure you see it - but I wonοΏ½t do this for
every message I write to any mailing list normally.
Hi all:
I have the following recurring problem with mailing lists all over the Internet: people do reply to my posts, by they do not address or copy
me in their replies. They send their e-mails only to the mailing list. Or they reply to the previous reply, and forget to copy the original
poster
