Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq archives)

2003-10-31 Thread Scott Lambert
that the archRunner process went off the deep end somewhere between two and three days ago. I have the htdig patches for 2.1.3 installed. Which might be germane... -- Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq archives)

2003-10-31 Thread Scott Lambert
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 03:52:34PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote: Once I kill off the mailman queue runners and clean up the several lock files for this mailing list, it runs just fine and manages to empty the archive queue. Well, the above statement is not entirely accurate. It was working

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq archives)

2003-10-31 Thread Scott Lambert
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: At 6:21 PM -0500 2003/10/31, Scott Lambert wrote: I haven't looked at the code yet, and probably won't (ENOTIME), but it almost sounds to me like it's not pruning it's list of handled messages and has to walk all of them each

Re: [Mailman-Users] ban_list example?

2003-10-13 Thread Scott Lambert
: The ^.*something regex is equivalent to just something. ^.* is useless, confusing and should never be used in a regex for the regex libraries with which I am familiar. -- Scott Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED