Re: [Mailman-Users] Renaming a list

2016-03-23 Thread The Mailing List System Admin
CN> What I have done is modify the clone_list command to combine the CN> renaming/cloning of a list and include an option to rebuild the CN> archives. However, the archives will not be rebuilt if the CN> scrub_nondigest setting is Yes. Sounds like a worthwhile enhancement. MS> I will try

[Mailman-Users] HyperKitty and Mailman V2

2016-02-25 Thread The Mailing List System Admin
HyperKitty looks really good. The scription says... "HyperKitty is a Django-based application providing a web interface to access GNU Mailman v3 archives, and interact with the lists." Does anybody know off hand if there is there any reason it couldn't be used with Mailman V2? --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bounce email going to list server admin not list owner...

2016-02-25 Thread The Mailing List System Admin
Thanks to both Mark (MS) and Stephen for their replies. MS> All I can suggest is you look at your MTA logs and try to MS> determine to what message this is a response and what generated MS> this message. I track down the original message id, here's what I found in the MTA logs... 1) Msg from

[Mailman-Users] Bounce email going to list server admin not list owner...

2016-02-24 Thread The Mailing List System Admin
Didn't have luck researching this question. I (the list server admin) recently received the following bounce notice: From joe.anyb...@example.edu Wed Feb 24 15:55:18 2016 Return-Path: From: "Anybody, Joe" To: Xyz.Forum

[Mailman-Users] web interface for sync_members redux

2016-02-12 Thread The Mailing List System Admin
I see that people have requested in the past a web interface to the syn_members functionality, and found at least two patches to modify the current web interface to do this. At this early stage of the game with Mailman, I'm not willing to be doing things like patching Mailman, so I was wondering

Re: [Mailman-Users] web interface for sync_members redux

2016-02-12 Thread The Mailing List System Admin
Mark Sapiro recently wrote, in part... See the FAQ at and the members.c program attached... Thanks for the reference. The issue with the members.c approach is it has no good way to do the authentication and neither does the calling CGI or