Re: [Mailman-Users] Status of virtual mailing list management

also sprach Barry Warsaw [2010.02.18.1121 +1300]: > > Looking at the docs at > > http://packages.python.org/mailman/docs/README.html, I cannot > > find any mention of virtual hosting. Will mailman 3 be able to > > host f...@bar.com as well as f...@baz.org as two separate lists? > > Yes. The key

Re: [Mailman-Users] Status of virtual mailing list management

also sprach Mark Sapiro [2010.02.17.1506 +1300]: > Yes. See "Wart removal" on the wiki page at > . Thanks. I think it would be beneficial to add a note about Mailman 3 to the main page under "current version", including a link to the wiki page. Ideally, there would

[Mailman-Users] Status of virtual mailing list management

Hey folks, I only just returned to mailman after a long time away and found 3.0 in active development. Yay! Looking at the docs at http://packages.python.org/mailman/docs/README.html, I cannot find any mention of virtual hosting. Will mailman 3 be able to host f...@bar.com as well as f...@baz.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] cloning subscriber list to another list

also sprach Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.29.0249 +0200]: > Unless you want to write your own Python script to populate the new > list from the old, I think duplication is your easiest choice. Here's > an outline of what I suggest you can do. This sounds like sound advice. Thanks, Mark.

[Mailman-Users] cloning subscriber list to another list

Dear list, I am faced with the situation of forking a list of several hundred subscribers in such a way that the result is two lists with exactly the same subscriber set, but with different settings. I am aware of list_members and sync_members, but that will not migrate nomail and digest users pr

Re: [Mailman-Users] content filtering not working as expected

also sprach Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.20.0211 +0100]: > Beginning in 2.1.6, Privacy options...->Spam > filters->header_filter_rules will match sub-part headers allowing > you to match things like content-type of subparts, attachment file > name extensions, etc. and specify Hold, Reje

Re: [Mailman-Users] content filtering not working as expected

also sprach Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.19.2301 +0100]: > Note this action is not taken if after filtering the message still > contains content. In that case the message is always forwarded on to > the list membership. Sorry for not seeing this. Now I wonder if it's possible to

[Mailman-Users] content filtering not working as expected

I have a 2.1.5 installation, and one list is using the following content_filter options: filter_content = True filter_mime_types = '' pass_mime_types = """multipart text application/pgp-signature application/pdf""" convert_html_to_plaintext = True filter_action = 1

Re: [Mailman-Users] Run a script when new lists are created

also sprach Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.12.0156 +0100]: > In mm_cfg.py, you set MTA = 'SomeName'. Then you create a python > script Mailman/MTA/SomeName.py with a create() and a remove() > function and these are called respectively whenever a list is > created or removed. See the exist

Re: [Mailman-Users] Run a script when new lists are created

If you create mailinglists over the web, I don't know. If you create them from the command line, provide a wrapper to newlist in /usr/local/sbin... -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid/expired p

Re: [Mailman-Users] how to set everyone's moderation bit

also sprach Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.15.0043 +0100]: > Go to the admin//members page and you will find an interface > to set all members' moderation bit. Oh that was too easy! -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*>

[Mailman-Users] how to set everyone's moderation bit

I have a list of 1400 users and I want to set everyone's moderation bit. I tried using an automated script with wget, but apparently, Mailman (2.1.5-1.1, from Debian) does not want to honour such requests: setting the 'mod' bit and submitting the changes does not seem to have an effect; the bit is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Update: LDAP Membership Adaptor V3.0

also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.30.1506 +0200]: > Most of the code here is his, I've modified it to use group > membership to populate the lists. Define populate, please? Is this a one-time import feature, or is the directory server contacted in real-time? -- martin;

Re: [Mailman-Users] Fwd: -1 cluster-admins moderator request(s) waiting

ved went to all of your expenses, which is inexcusable. Please forgive... -- Martin F. KrafftArtificial Intelligence Laboratory Ph.D. Student Department of Information Technology Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Zurich Tel: +41.(0)44.63-54323 An

[Mailman-Users] Fwd: -1 cluster-admins moderator request(s) waiting

Please attend to this at your earliest convenience. This notice of pending requests, if any, will be sent out daily. - End forwarded message - -- Martin F. KrafftArtificial Intelligence Laboratory Ph.D. Student Department of Information Technology Email

[Mailman-Users] scrubbing attachments

In our lab, everyone continuously sends PDFs of several megabytes. Mailman archives these nicely, referencing scrubbed attachments from the archived message: A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: programm_ssf04.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 3477360 bytes Desc: not available Url

[Mailman-Users] create list on subscribe

Hi all, I want to create a listserv to allow folks to subscribe to single bugs in the Debian BTS. Instead of creating the 27 lists up front, I want them to be created as people subscribe (if the list name matches a regexp or list of conditions). I know Mailman better than any other MLM, so I

[Mailman-Users] moderated lists -- how?

If I want to set up a moderated list (-announce style) where only a selected bunch of folks may post and all others get held, how do I do that? Do I have to set the moderation bit for all non-posters to true, or is there an easier way? Thanks, -- martin; (greetings from the heart of

Re: [Mailman-Users] regular expressions in whitelists

also sprach Ian Eiloart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.10.1136 +0200]: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cvs\.ailab.\.ch$ > ^ > | >++ >| > That extra dot looks wrong Oh my. Sorry for the noise. There's something to be said about "four eyes see

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1.[45]: config.db.last not found

also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.09.0928 +0200]: > > They both look like "empty" pickles. Mailman's bin/dumpdb > > doesn't show any objects marshalled in either config.pck (and in > > fact od says the files are full of zeroes

[Mailman-Users] regular expressions in whitelists

I promise, I searched the web for this, but all I could find was information that I am doing this right. I am trying to get a CVS commits list to accept mails from our CVS domain, using the following regexp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cvs\.ailab.\.ch$ However, this is not matching, I still have to moder

[Mailman-Users] qfiles/in

I have two .pck files in qfiles/in, because the configuration of the lists was broken. How do I tell mailman to process them regularly? Thanks, -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid/expired pgp

[Mailman-Users] setting NOMAIL in bulk

How can I set NOMAIL in bulk? I have a list of address/list pairs and want to configure them as NOMAIL. I guess this must be possible with withlist or the like, but I just can't figure it out. Would you give me a hint? Thanks! -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \__

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1.[45]: config.db.last not found

also sprach Jim Tittsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.09.0920 +0200]: > They both look like "empty" pickles. Mailman's bin/dumpdb doesn't > show any objects marshalled in either config.pck (and in fact od > says the files are full of zeroes). Oh no! This is so weird, and in fact, it's propagated

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1.[45]: config.db.last not found

also sprach Jim Tittsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.09.0404 +0200]: > That means that it was not able to load either your config.pck or > config.pck.last files, and it is trying to fall back to the > config.db (or config.db.last) as last resorts. (In fact your > Mailman logs/error log should be

Re: [Mailman-Users] 2.1.[45]: config.db.last not found

also sprach Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.09.0409 +0200]: > Just a thought and possibly irrelevant, but do you in fact have the > site list created? You don't say. The list is usually named "mailman" > unless you have assigned a different name to MAILMAN_SITE_LIST in > mm_cfg.py. Yes, c

[Mailman-Users] 2.1.[45]: config.db.last not found

Folks, I am experiencing a strange problem with Mailman 2.1.[45] (it does not matter which version I try; I can't try 2.1.3 because it won't let me downgrade...), and I don't really know when it started. We had some problems with a server and had to reboot it. Since then, Mailman does not come up

Re: [Mailman-Users] cascaded lists -- any tips?

also sprach Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.02.19.1402 +0100]: > Or, Hmm... You may hack SpamDetect.py's last line as > > --- SpamDetect.py.orig Thu Feb 19 21:40:56 2004 > +++ SpamDetect.py Thu Feb 19 21:43:14 2004 > @@ -122,4 +122,4 @@ > if action == mm_cfg.HO

Re: [Mailman-Users] cascaded lists -- any tips?

also sprach Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.02.19.1209 +0100]: > Maybe, but it is an inevitable consequence of Mailman's model as > currently in use. You might be advised to look into the list archives > for alternative approaches to your problem see, for instance: > > http://www.mail-

Re: [Mailman-Users] cascaded lists -- any tips?

also sprach Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.02.19.0036 +0100]: > > This works okay until someone posts a message to A, which is to be > > moderated. I accept the message for A, and then am asked to do the > > same for B and C, then for D, E, F and then for G, H. Thus, I have > > to visit th

[Mailman-Users] accept_these_nonmembers & require_explicit_destination

putting an address in accept_these_nonmembers does not allow this person to Bcc a list when require_explicit_destination is on. this is because member-checking is done before recipient checking. is there a way to whitelist some posters to allow them to Bcc a list? if not, how do i submit a feature

[Mailman-Users] cascaded lists -- any tips?

I administer a set of cascaded lists, or umbrella lists, however you want to call them. The setup is something along the following lines: A -> B, C, users B -> D, E, F C -> users D -> users E -> users F -> G, H, users G -> users H -> users Even though I configured the umbrella_list settings accor

[Mailman-Users] accept_these_nonmembers & require_explicit_destination

putting an address in accept_these_nonmembers does not allow this person to Bcc a list when require_explicit_destination is on. this is because member-checking is done before recipient checking. is there a way to whitelist some posters to allow them to Bcc a list? if not, how do i submit a feature

[Mailman-Users] cascaded lists -- any tips?

I administer a set of cascaded lists, or umbrella lists, however you want to call them. The setup is something along the following lines: A -> B, C, users B -> D, E, F C -> users D -> users E -> users F -> G, H, users G -> users H -> users Even though I configured the umbrella_list settings accor

[Mailman-Users] mailman bug

ii mailman2.1.4-1Powerful, web-based mailing list manager ii python2.3 2.3.3-5An interactive high-level object-oriented la Hi there, I would like to report a bug in mailman 2.1.4, which only surfaces, when config_list is used to import a configuration file that sets