--On Monday, April 15, 2002 4:30 PM -0700 Dan Mick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No one that I'm aware of on the Mailman team is against the
> idea of editing messages in the moderation process.
That's terrific news!
I will issue my patch when 2.1 goes gold.
--
I will definitely issue an editing patch for 2.1 when it goes gold. Since
this is one of their "we don't think you should WANT to do this"
hot-buttons, like controlling the List-* headers, I don't want to issue
patches for prerelease versions and encourage them to do any
counter-engineering.
Sorry, I missed this when it first appeared.
John W Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One can patch the installation, if one manages the Mailman installation
> and has or develops the skills.
>
> One can't, if one uses the Mailman installation managed as a service by
> someone else. Suitable b
You can edit pending messages in Mailman 2.0.8 with the following patch. I
have not tested it on 2.0.9 yet. This method will probably never make the
official FAQ, but it will always be online in gzipped form at
http://www.panix.com/~tneff/mailman20_edit_patch.gz
First, increase
I tried and shelved stripmime.pl. Demime kicks its butt & gives much more
comprehensive service. My advice is to install and use it instead.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Some suspicious individual named Skip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thelist: "|/usr/local/bin/stripmime.pl|/home/mailman/mail/wrapper
> post thelist"
>
> Viewing a generated plain text digest I can't see that stripmime.pl did
> anything. None of the five messages was lost, but none appear to h
> Don't blame the weaknesses of your selection of tools on the
> material.
>
> --
> J C Lawrence
I speak as a list manager, not as an individual member. As a member I am
fully prepared to get & use any tool I need to deal with stuff, but as a
list manager I
The problem is that they don't really Digest or pack anything, or save any
space, or do anything except collate a bunch of stuff into a multipart
sandwich. There's precious little of use to be done with them that you
couldn't do just as easily by getting individual messages and putting them
i
MIME "Digests" (ultimate misnomer) still suck, even if somebody
misidentified them with the words Outlook Express. They exist because the
architecture allowed it, not to solve a practical problem. Regardless of
terminology, we should make sure that Mailman users know how to avoid them.
-
