.
Thanks for your help.
Clare
-Original Message-
From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net]
Sent: 05 April 2011 22:28
To: Clare Redstone; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Autoresponder and privacy
Clare Redstone wrote:
I've just moved a discussion group from majordomo
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:step...@xemacs.org]
Sent: 06 April 2011 01:10
To: Clare Redstone
Cc: mailman-users@python.org
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Autoresponder and privacy
Clare Redstone writes:
I can warn everyone about this and suggest that, if they don't want
Clare Redstone writes:
How insecure? Are they more vulnerable than a members-only Yahoo or Google
group for example?
Probably a little more vulnerable, for social reasons. Your members-
only password at Yahoo/Google is your personal mail password; people
probably protect those fairly well
Hi!
On Mit, 2011-04-06 at 08:24 +0100, Clare Redstone wrote:
[...]
Thank you for replying so quickly. I don't understand some of the technical
stuff to understand why
the autoresponder message came to me not the group. But am glad it did!
The mail headers are set up so that these type of
Clare Redstone wrote:
Thank you for replying so quickly. I don't understand some of the technical
stuff to understand why
the autoresponder message came to me not the group. But am glad it did!
Because we're a discussion group, I have MM set up for reply to the list.
Since autoresponders that
I've just moved a discussion group from majordomo to Mailman and posted the
first message to the group. So far, I've had one autoresponder message sent
back. Thankfully, from what I can see, it only came to me and not to the
list address, so hasn't started to loop.
But I've a problem over
Clare Redstone wrote:
I've just moved a discussion group from majordomo to Mailman and posted the
first message to the group. So far, I've had one autoresponder message sent
back. Thankfully, from what I can see, it only came to me and not to the
list address, so hasn't started to loop.
Any
Clare Redstone writes:
I can warn everyone about this and suggest that, if they don't want
their details revealed, they only use an address that they won't
set out of office.
As Mark said, this is in some sense the best you can do. It's not
really possible to filter on contact details,
