Sorry, I was a bit premature in my question. Apparently, an admin with
little knowledge of the settings had toggled the non_digest settings to
scrub everything. I missed that setting after going through it several
times.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Christopher Adams
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
Hello all,
A list administrator reports that all attachments are being scrubbed, in
the sent messages and in the archives. The site default is to not use
Content Filtering and this list uses that default. Also, there are many
other lists with the same default settings and I am not hearing of this
Manuel Kissoyan wrote:
>
>Where exactly are saved the atatchement files, also in which format uencoded
>or just like the original attachement file?
Scrubbed attachments are stored in the directory
archives/private//attachments. In most cases, they are just
the original attachment (decoded from th
hi!
Where exactly are saved the atatchement files, also in which format uencoded
or just like the original attachement file?
thank you in advance!
> At 3:04 PM -0300 2005-09-27, Manuel Kissoyan wrote:
>
>> My question is, how long are these files saved for people to download
>
> They a
At 2:29 PM +0900 2005-09-29, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Brad>Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely
> Brad> to collide.
>
> Can we stop pandering to the broken mailers, please? Are we not
> hackers? We know how to handle collisions.
I don't really care
> "John" == John W Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> In addition, the Message-Id values would have to be
John> filtered, if used as is, for URL-unfriendly characters
I don't think so. AFAIK, that was fixed about 2000 RFCs ago. When
used as URLs, conforming agents will URL-enc
> "Brad" == Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brad> At 2:03 PM +0900 2005-09-28, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> Why archivers don't use Message-Id for the URL, I don't know.
Brad> Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely
Brad> to collide.
Can we sto
At 8:50 AM -0700 2005-09-28, John W. Baxter wrote:
> The hash of Message-Id:, Date:, and Received: (all of the Received: headers)
> would do, except for the case of an insane MTA--the one generating the "top"
> Received: header--feeding the same message into Mailman multiple times.
> Perhaps a
On 9/28/05 1:30 AM, "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why archivers don't use Message-Id for the URL, I don't know.
>
> Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely to
> collide.
In addition, the Message-Id values would have to be filtered, if used as is,
for URL-unfriendly
At 2:03 PM +0900 2005-09-28, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Why archivers don't use Message-Id for the URL, I don't know.
Because some MUAs generate message-ids that are likely to
collide. For some time now, I've been arguing that they should use a
hash of the relevant information (mayb
> "Brad" == Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Im assuming they self delete after a while because clicking on
>> one of the link now indicates its not there."
Brad> That implies that something else is going on. There
Brad> is no standard cron job that I know of
At 3:04 PM -0300 2005-09-27, Manuel Kissoyan wrote:
> My question is, how long are these files saved for people to download
They are saved until some other process comes along to clean them out.
>and
> are they aut
Hi,
Wondering if someone know the answer of this, made for one of our clients...
"With the mailman software for mailing lists, it has the option of scrubbing
attatchments to the list and converts them to a link for people who are on the
list to click on to get the attatchment rather than every
Hi all,
I am using mailman 2.0.13 and if users are sending attachemnts (they are
allowed to do that and I want to archive these attachments) these files
are displayed as MIME streams. I want these files saved with links to it
in the particular mail or a list of attached files or something like
Stefan,
If you turn on sending the moderators an immediate moderation message
(General Options, "should the list moderators get immediate notice ..."
set to Yes), then the moderators will get a copy of the message,
including any attachments.
Heim, Stefan, Dipl.-ing. wrote:
Hello,
Is it possibl
Hello,
Is it possible to see the contents of the Attachements
bevor the mail is approved to delivary (moderated list) ?
We use mailman v. 2.1.1
Thanks!
--
Stefan Heim
Sektion Informatik i.d. Psychotherapie
Am Hochsträß 8
89081 Ulm/Germany
Tel: +49-731-50025702
Fax: +49-731-50025662
-
Hi all
My attachements (Msword) to my list are getting saved with .bin extension. I
would like to have them saved with the original extensions. How do I do it
..?
Thanks
- Ram
_
Go down memory lane. Revisit the cool times.
http:
But make sure that the maximum email size is set (in mailman) to include
the attachments
Cheers
Brian
At 19:47 20/12/2002, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Hi,
1) Attachments are no problem for Mailman as long as your MTA allows them
2) Attachments can easily be stripped from inbound email at your MTA (n
Hi,
1) Attachments are no problem for Mailman as long as your MTA allows them
2) Attachments can easily be stripped from inbound email at your MTA (not by
Mailman). I am quite happy with demime (www.google.com/search?q=demime) on
my mailinglist server.
-Jim P.
> -Original Message-
> F
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 11:02 AM, Staven Bruce wrote:
I am new to Mailman, and have just set a server running Redhat 8.0 with
Mailman 2.1(I Think). We are using teh listserve strictly as a "one
way"
communication to our clients, distributing a monthly newsletter. I
have had
several re
Hello,
I am new to Mailman, and have just set a server running Redhat 8.0 with
Mailman 2.1(I Think). We are using teh listserve strictly as a "one way"
communication to our clients, distributing a monthly newsletter. I have had
several requests to include attachments with these newsletters, word a
>> Is there are way to for this tired list admin to not allow posters to
>> post attachments?
>
>The normal way is to use stripmime, demime, or a similar tool that
>"flattens" a mime message down to plain text and removes all
>attachments.
There's also my patches for mailman-2.0.5. See:
http:/
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, L Gallegos wrote:
> Is there are way to for this tired list admin to not allow posters to
> post attachments?
The normal way is to use stripmime, demime, or a similar tool that
"flattens" a mime message down to plain text and removes all
attachments.
Barry has hinted that fu
"L Gallegos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there are way to for this tired list admin to not allow posters to
> post attachments?
You can use stripmime --> http://www.phred.org/~alex/stripmime.html or
demime --> http://scifi.squawk.com/demime.html
I have tested demime and it works fine.
G
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:39:37 -0400
L Gallegos wrote:
> Is there are way to for this tired list admin to not allow posters
> to post attachments?
Configure the list to hole all messages which have a Content-Type
string of other than text/plain.
--
J C Lawrence
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, L Gallegos wrote:
> Is there are way to for this tired list admin to not allow posters to
> post attachments?
Set the maximum attachment size to 0KB?
--
Regards,
Juha
PGP fingerprint:
B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544
-
Is there are way to for this tired list admin to not allow posters to
post attachments?
Leah G.
--
Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 07:33:56 -0500
Sal Batlle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Are there any known problems with attachments and digest. One
> of my users decided to get a daily digest, however, attachments
> are converted to plain text and included in the body of the
> digest.
Tell him to use
Hi,
Are there any known problems with attachments and digest. One of my users
decided to get a daily digest, however, attachments are converted to plain
text and included in the body of the digest.
Can anyone shed some light on this little problem?
Thanks,
Sal
Hi,
Are there any known problems with attachments and
digest. One of my users decided to get a daily digest, however,
attachments are converted to plain text and included in the body of the
digest.
Can anyone shed some light on this little
problem?
Thanks,
Sal
30 matches
Mail list logo
