At 11:53 AM -0800 2/23/07, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Yes. I send spam to your list spoofing [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the sender.
> You send a reject message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which has my original
> spam attached. Poor joe receives my spam from you - not a good thing.
Yes, but Mailman will only send
At 9:47 AM -0800 2/23/07, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Discard is better than Reject unless you feel you might receive
> non-member posts for which it is important to respond in some way,
> i.e. some legitimate request from a non-member who would assume the
> request was received in the absence of a n
Mike Starr wrote:
>Thanks so much for the help; I've set it to Reject for the moment. Could
>you expand on why Discard might be better? Are there spam issues with
>the concept of sending a rejection email?
Yes. I send spam to your list spoofing [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the sender.
You send a reject
On 2/23/07, Mike Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just took over administering a list and get a few spam messages to the
> list from non-members. I looked at the available information and
> couldn't figure out how to set the list admin controls to automatically
> reject any message to the list
Mike Starr wrote:
>I just took over administering a list and get a few spam messages to the
>list from non-members. I looked at the available information and
>couldn't figure out how to set the list admin controls to automatically
>reject any message to the list from a non-member. We're a small gr
I just took over administering a list and get a few spam messages to the
list from non-members. I looked at the available information and
couldn't figure out how to set the list admin controls to automatically
reject any message to the list from a non-member. We're a small group
with a tightly cont
