[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Q1Why are they called 'uncaught' ... ?
This is pretty standard jargon. There are low level routines, each of
which traps the errors it expects. Some trap mice, some trap bears,
some trap bacteria.
Every once in a while, something unimaginable like the Loch Ness
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Q1Why are they called 'uncaught' since they have clearly been sent to a
>Mailman address, and then neatly packaged up by Mailman and sent to me as list
>and/or site admin? Are they really just 'unrecognizable' possible bounces (as
>it says in the body of the Mailm
Hi
I've just upgraded to Mailman 2.1.9 from a much earlier installation.
One of the new features that puzzles me is the 'uncaught bounce notification'.
I get these for out-of-office responses and for auto-replies.
The auto-replies come from some artificial mailbox address.
The out-of-office re