If you maintain people's names on the list, then the same procedure can be
used to remove someone based on some string in the name, in case you know
the name but not the address (I often get such requests):
bin/list_members -f | grep -e ""| wc
bin/list_members -f | grep -v -e "" >
bin/list_mem
Tim wrote:
>This should be in the FAQ.
>
>At 07:43 AM 2/26/2006, Allan Hansen wrote:
>>How about:
>>
>>bin/list_members -f |grep -v -e "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >
>>bin/sync_members -f
The FAQ has been updated.
--
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Ba
Excellent! Worked like a charm. This should be in the FAQ.
Thanks much!
Tim
At 07:43 AM 2/26/2006, Allan Hansen wrote:
>How about:
>
>bin/list_members -f |grep -v -e "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >
>bin/sync_members -f
>
>Allan
>
>
>
>>Tim wrote:
>>>
>>>We have a subscriber address that has /t on th
How about:
bin/list_members -f |grep -v -e "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >
bin/sync_members -f
Allan
>Tim wrote:
>>
>>We have a subscriber address that has /t on the end of it ([EMAIL
>>PROTECTED]/t) which can only be seen when dumping the lists config file. The
>>subscriber address looks normal [
Tim wrote:
>
>We have a subscriber address that has /t on the end of it ([EMAIL
>PROTECTED]/t) which can only be seen when dumping the lists config file. The
>subscriber address looks normal [EMAIL PROTECTED]) when looking for it using
>any other method (list members, etc).
Do you mean '\t',
We are using Mailman v 2.1.4 on a Linux box with postfix and I am site admin.
We have a subscriber address that has /t on the end of it ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/t)
which can only be seen when dumping the lists config file. The subscriber
address looks normal [EMAIL PROTECTED]) when looking for it us
