Hi.
I'm unable to configure Mailman, because when I edit and run mm_cfg.py
(python ./mm_cfg.py) I get this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./mm_cfg.py, line 44, in ?
from Defaults import *
ImportError: No module named Defaults
Well, Defaults.py, Defaults.pyo and
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Carl Fink wrote:
I'm unable to configure Mailman, because when I edit and run mm_cfg.py
You don't run mm_cfg.py You just edit it.
It contains values that are then read by the other programs when they run.
==
Chris
Carl Fink wrote:
I'm unable to configure Mailman, because when I edit and run mm_cfg.py
(python ./mm_cfg.py) I get this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./mm_cfg.py, line 44, in ?
from Defaults import *
ImportError: No module named Defaults
As Christopher said in another
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
I'm unable to configure Mailman, because when I edit and run mm_cfg.py
(python ./mm_cfg.py) I get this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ./mm_cfg.py, line 44, in ?
from Defaults import *
ImportError: No module named Defaults
As
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 08:30:34AM -0700, Dragon wrote:
Yeah, that all seems a bit strange but if he can stop and
successfully restart his qrunners, then the edits are syntactically
correct and mailman can at least understand what is there. Whether
those edits are then lexically and
At 12:14 PM -0400 2006-06-01, Carl Fink wrote:
I actually did restart Mailman, with no errors, and so far it seems to have
taken my changes. If mm_cfg is just there to be read from, why is it a
script instead of a text file /etc/mailman?
Because with a text /etc/mailman.cf
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:18:04AM -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
When the configuration is done in the Python language in a Python
script, you can let Python do all the parsing, and do the equivalent
of #include in order to pull in all your configuration details.
Fair enough. Like I
On 6/1/06 9:30 AM, Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:18:04AM -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
When the configuration is done in the Python language in a Python
script, you can let Python do all the parsing, and do the equivalent
of #include in order to pull in all your
Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:18:04AM -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
When the configuration is done in the Python language in a Python
script, you can let Python do all the parsing, and do the equivalent
of #include in order to pull in all your configuration details.
Fair
John W. Baxter wrote:
On 6/1/06 9:30 AM, Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:18:04AM -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
When the configuration is done in the Python language in a Python
script, you can let Python do all the parsing, and do the equivalent
of #include in
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Jim Popovitch wrote:
I am no Python expert either, but i am a competent perl and C++
programmer. After about 4 years of tweaking and changing Python code,
I've learned to appreciate it's power, but also it's simplicity. Python
is a very well designed
On 6/1/06 1:10 PM, Carl Zwanzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, I agree, but I question a language that relies on indent level
for blocking and don't let you include blank lines for readability. I guess
it's ok when you get used to it. But then again, I mostly work in tcl at
this
Carl Zwanzig wrote:
In general, I agree, but I question a language that relies on indent level
for blocking and don't let you include blank lines for readability. I guess
it's ok when you get used to it.
The forced indentation is something there will probably never be even
close to universal
13 matches
Mail list logo
