Re: [Mailman-Users] Client wants unique archiving method

2006-09-27 Thread Elizabeth Schwartz
Oh nevermind, I am on crack. This wouldn't work. You'd still have to use some intermediate filter to decide what was a reply and what was an original. On 9/27/06, Elizabeth Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would think you could make it work "outside the system" by setting > reply-to-poste

Re: [Mailman-Users] Client wants unique archiving method

2006-09-27 Thread Elizabeth Schwartz
I would think you could make it work "outside the system" by setting reply-to-poster, then changing the alias for the list to go both to the list processing command, and to a dummy-user . Then pipe the dummy user's mail into something that is web-accessible. You could use another mailman list, and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Client wants unique archiving method

2006-08-23 Thread Andrew Jones
On Aug 23, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Dragon wrote: > They are on crack. And you really don't want to get into this can > of worms. I'm not saying it couldn't be done, but it is not > something that would be easy nor reliable. See below for the full > explanation. Thanks for the quick and (very) de

Re: [Mailman-Users] Client wants unique archiving method

2006-08-23 Thread Dragon
Andrew Jones sent the message below at 11:23 8/23/2006: >I just moved a client to Dreamhost from another provider where they >also had a Mailman discussion list. > >Everything is working at Dreamhost, but they have a strange request. >They want all original posts to go to all subscribers as normal.

[Mailman-Users] Client wants unique archiving method

2006-08-23 Thread Andrew Jones
I just moved a client to Dreamhost from another provider where they also had a Mailman discussion list. Everything is working at Dreamhost, but they have a strange request. They want all original posts to go to all subscribers as normal. BUT, they want all replies to ONLY go to the original