Happy Holidays Just catching up on some of the archives so forgive my belated response. I use and would like to see the patches integrated in 2.1 I think it's very usefulI. I maintain a fairly active server with ~500 (and growing) lists at UCI.
My two cents Con Wieland University of California at Irvine At 3:57 AM -0800 11/30/01, Richard Barrett wrote: >Having posted Mailman-htdig integration patches on sourceforge and >subsequently maintained them I am interested in finding out how many sites >have adopted the patches and want to continue using them. The patches I'm >referring to are: > >http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=444879&group_id=103&at >id=300103 > >http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=444884&group_id=103&at >id=300103 > >and their earlier incarnations 401669/401670: > >I'm asking for two reasons: > >1. to gauge the likely demand for MM 2.1 compatible version of the patch >and how urgently it is needed. btw: I've got a MM 2.1a3 compatible version >of the patches about to be tested and hope to post them on sourceforge next >week. > >2. to see if there is sufficient demand for the patch being integrated with >the main development trunk of MM. If enough users say they want it then >presumably the primary MM developers will consider a request to fold the >patch into the main development line post the MM 2.1 release. My motives >here are fairly selfish in that I'd like to avoid having to redevelop and >test the patch again for the next major MM release after 2.1 > >Reply off list would probably be appropriate. I will collate the responses >and post to the list a summary of the interest expressed. > >Thanks > >Richard > > >------------------------------------------------------ >Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
