[Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

We're seeing the footer coming along as an attachment on some end-users systems. I saw a FAQ entry for this behavior with 2.0.x. We're running 2.1.4 and the FAQ article specifies that it is fixed in 2.1.x. Anyone know what is going on? Thanks, Hunter ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

Hunter Hillegas wrote on Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:14:20 -0700: > We're seeing the footer coming along as an attachment on some end-users > systems. > Something similar has been mentioned here some days ago. I think this can happen if the mail sent to the list is HTML. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

That sounds like our situation. Any way to fix this and retain the message in HTML format? > From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:32:43 +0200 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Foote

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

Quoting Hunter Hillegas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > That sounds like our situation. > > Any way to fix this and retain the message in HTML format? Not unless you can figure out how to append arbitrary text to an HTML document without parsing the HTML document tree and figuring out how and where to sti

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

To: Mailman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1? > > Quoting Hunter Hillegas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> That sounds like our situation. >> >> Any way to fix this and retain the message in HTML format? > > Not u

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

At 8:19 AM -0700 2004/04/29, Hunter Hillegas wrote: Perhaps this caveat should be noted in the FAQ or doco. It seems like a pretty common scenario, no? I believe that it already is, but I'd have to check. -- Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

Hunter Hillegas wrote on Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:08:13 -0700: > Any way to fix this and retain the message in HTML format? > Add the footer in HTML and integrate it in the existing message ;-) Better solution: keep HTML off the list, it annoys many people and spoils archiving. Kai -- Kai Schät

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

At 11:07 AM -0400 2004/04/29, Paul Tomblin wrote: Any way to fix this and retain the message in HTML format? Not unless you can figure out how to append arbitrary text to an HTML document without parsing the HTML document tree and figuring out how and where to stick it and how to make it visib

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

Quoting Kai Schaetzl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hunter Hillegas wrote on Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:08:13 -0700: > > Any way to fix this and retain the message in HTML format? > > Add the footer in HTML and integrate it in the existing message ;-) Better Where? Before the tag (if there is one)? Before t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

If this was my call, I would never allow HTML in any email ever. > From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:32:29 +0200 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

At 8:19 AM -0700 2004/04/29, Hunter Hillegas wrote: Perhaps this caveat should be noted in the FAQ or doco. It seems like a pretty common scenario, no? Okay, this is now in the FAQ. See . Let me know if you think there sh

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

Paul Tomblin wrote on Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:39:03 -0400: > And what about the principle that you shouldn't mess with the body of a > message except for putting clearly marked headers and footers that are > obviously not part of the sender's text? Once you start trying to parse > the html and put so

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

On 29 Apr 2004, at 21:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Paul Tomblin wrote on Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:39:03 -0400: And what about the principle that you shouldn't mess with the body of a message except for putting clearly marked headers and footers that are obviously not part of the sender's text? Once you s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Footer Appended as Attachment in 2.1?

Richard Barrett wrote on Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:35:07 +0100: > Do I hear a volunteer. Sounds like someone about to break out the text > editor and demonstrate what open software is all about. > Not me. I'm really not interested in HTML in email in any form :-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germa