Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users writes:
> > Some of these may be hidden (eg, Reply-To is normally not displayed;
> > I don't know offhand if it's in the mbox files).
>
> Yes, Reply-To: is a standard header and included in mbox files.
"The" mbox files refers to what Mailman stores in
On 05/22/2018 07:46 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Many posts will include their names in CCs, especially on lists that
munge Reply-To.
Don't forget the munged reply. }:-)
Some of these may be hidden (eg, Reply-To is normally not displayed;
I don't know offhand if it's in the mbox files).
Ángel writes:
> First of all, and I think it hasn't been mentioned yet is the Right
> to access, ie. of letting people know which data you have about
> them.
>
> I would consider that listing all post by email address X would
> fulfill it, plus a search feature (*) in case they want to
On 5/15/18 6:50 PM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> On 05/15/2018 07:04 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Actually, the easiest way is to just redact the cumulative
>> LIST.mbox/LIST.mbox file and rebuild the archive with 'bin/arch
>> --wipe' but that can have undesired side effects.
>
>
Duly noted.
On 05/15/2018 07:04 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Actually, the easiest way is to just redact the cumulative
LIST.mbox/LIST.mbox file and rebuild the archive with 'bin/arch --wipe'
but that can have undesired side effects.
Doesn't that run the risk of renumbering messages, thus breaking
On 5/15/18 11:51 AM, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> I would likely have (presuming sufficient motivation):
>
> 1) Get mailman into a state that I can safely modify the archive.
> 2) Run a script (likely sed) to REDACT the contents.
> sed -i$ticketID 's/phone
