Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes. You chopped the context off, but we were talking about the > meta-code used in programing the Listinfo web page. > > HTML tags are no longer allowed in the List Description field of the web > admin interface. But that is a story for another day. Ah. That

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-11 Thread Jon Carnes
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 02:59, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I explained this exact problem/resolution to someone else last week. I > > looks like during an upgrade, the upgrade parses the listinfo html and > > modifies the non-standard html statements. It's made

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
> Do you have more than one body tag in the source? No. -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-BerlinFax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 Referat V a -

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Find attached a screenshot of the admin page (to see the tags I > entered) and the resulting listinfo page of "demo2", a new list. I had to remove the screenshot due to size limitations Find it here: http://www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/tdemo2.png -- R

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-11 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I explained this exact problem/resolution to someone else last week. I > looks like during an upgrade, the upgrade parses the listinfo html and > modifies the non-standard html statements. It's made the following > modifications (which are easily reversed): >

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-10 Thread Jon Carnes
Ralf loaned me his listinfo code and it was plain to see that during an upgrade the process parsed the listinfo html and modified the non-standard html statements. It's made the following modifications (which are easily reversed): "<" == "<" ">" == ">" It turned them into logical "greater tha

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-10 Thread Paul H Byerly
Jon Carnes said: > There simply are no (mailman) problems to adding in your own HTML to the > Listinfo pages. Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: There are, and they are here. I get: Do you have more than one body tag in the source? You don't need to out one in, as there is one to start with. Can yo

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-10 Thread Jon Carnes
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 09:38, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 01:11, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > > There simply are no (mailman) problems to adding in your own HTML to the > > Listinfo pages. > > There are, and they are here. > > I get: > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 01:11, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > There simply are no (mailman) problems to adding in your own HTML to the > Listinfo pages. There are, and they are here. I get: http://mailman.charite.de/mailman/subscribe/rundmail";>

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-10 Thread Jon Carnes
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 01:11, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > You can still used html but be wary of embedding one of the mega tags > > (used by mailman to generate html). The formating of the listinfo > > pages has changed, so you will have to adapt to get your o

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-09 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You can still used html but be wary of embedding one of the mega tags > (used by mailman to generate html). The formating of the listinfo > pages has changed, so you will have to adapt to get your old look > back... but it is possible. So, right now I insert "

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-09 Thread Adam Steer
..on a HTML note here - has anyone done any serious hacking of the 'look and feel' of Mailman? I've spent a few days crafting up a new web interface for an MM 2.0.x install here [one that gives up valid HTML even], but it requires modification of files that look likely to get over-written every ti

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-09 Thread Jon Carnes
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 17:18, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > Formerly we used 2.0.x, and we could use HTML in list descriptions. > Now we have 2.1.4, and all HTML tags are displayed "literally", e.g. as > > > > Bug or feature? You can still used html but be wary of embedding one of the mega tags (use

[Mailman-Users] HTML in list descriptions

2004-02-09 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
Formerly we used 2.0.x, and we could use HTML in list descriptions. Now we have 2.1.4, and all HTML tags are displayed "literally", e.g. as Bug or feature? -- Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 5