At 3:27 PM -0700 2005-05-09, Tyler Strickland wrote:
> That's entirely possible - the system is an old sun running sendmail.
Older versions of sendmail can certainly have some issues in this
respect. More modern versions work much better, but still require
some additional configuratio
On 05/09/2005 02:37 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 11:18 AM -0700 2005-05-09, Tyler Strickland wrote:
>
>> I'm running a fairly large (~125000 user) list that takes about 2 days
>> to send to. Say, for example, we notice an error in a message that we
>> sent out 2 hours ago, but that still has a
At 11:18 AM -0700 2005-05-09, Tyler Strickland wrote:
> I'm running a fairly large (~125000 user) list that takes about 2 days
> to send to. Say, for example, we notice an error in a message that we
> sent out 2 hours ago, but that still has about 2 days to go to get
> everything sent. Optim
I'm running a fairly large (~125000 user) list that takes about 2 days
to send to. Say, for example, we notice an error in a message that we
sent out 2 hours ago, but that still has about 2 days to go to get
everything sent. Optimization is an issue for another day, but is there
a way to stop