On 06/21/2016 09:59 AM, Scott Thompson wrote:
>
> How do I allow these through so I dont have to keep approving them?
> This is the email I get with pending requests:
>
> Cause: Message has implicit destination
>
>
> I want to allow those through automatically.
Set Privacy options... ->
Hello all.
How do I allow these through so I dont have to keep approving them?
This is the email I get with pending requests:
Cause: Message has implicit destination
I want to allow those through automatically.
Thanks!
Scott
--
On 4/13/16 7:30 AM, Larry Turnbull wrote:
>
> On one of my mailman lists a subscriber's messages keeps getting held for
> moderator approval with the implicit destination error.
This occurs because the list is not explicitly addressed in a To: or Cc:
header of the post. E.g., the post is sent
Hi all:
On one of my mailman lists a subscriber's messages keeps getting held for
moderator approval with the implicit destination error.
I went in to the privacy recipient settings and set the ceiling to 0.
Are there any other settings I can adjust to keep this error from occurring?
On 7/14/15 5:12 PM, Adam Morris wrote:
is there a way to set up mailman so if people send messages to one of my
lists and put the address in the cc field it is accepted instead of me
as owner having to approve the message?
If the list address is in Cc:, the message will not be held for
Hi all,
is there a way to set up mailman so if people send messages to one of my
lists and put the address in the cc field it is accepted instead of me
as owner having to approve the message?
--
Adam Morris
email:
a...@damorris.com
: Steve Burling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mailman Users mailman-users@python.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 4:22 PM
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Implicit destination
One of our lists has someone post to it whose mail is held, with the error:
Blind carbon copies or other implicit destinations
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But does Mailman have to treat this as an implicit address? Of course
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is not literally exactly the same as [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,
but the
list address is explicitly included within the quotes. Could a future version
of Mailman
allow for this and avoid
Steve Burling wrote:
But as near as I can tell, she *is* putting the list address in the To:
field, it's just been munged (presumably by Micro$oft LookOut) to have
quotes in funny places. Here's what the To: field looks like from the
listname.mbox file (edited to protect the innocent):
To:
Barry Finkel wrote:
Steve Burling wrote:
But as near as I can tell, she *is* putting the list address in the To:
field, it's just been munged (presumably by Micro$oft LookOut) to have
quotes in funny places. Here's what the To: field looks like from the
listname.mbox file (edited to protect
I just cannot seem to get a workable solution to a problem I am having
with Mailman. Although the list is set up to be unmoderated, I am still
getting message to accept or deny a message from members. The reason
is always the same: implicit destination. I have tried everything but
nothing works.
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Dr. John Caccavale wrote:
I just cannot seem to get a workable solution to a problem I am having
with Mailman. Although the list is set up to be unmoderated, I am still
getting message to accept or deny a message from members. The reason
is always the same:
Should the files in $prefix/cgi-bin be owned by root:mailman?
Shouldn't it be mailman:mailman?
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ:
On 7/14/06, Ki Song [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should the files in $prefix/cgi-bin be owned by root:mailman?
Shouldn't it be mailman:mailman?
This depends on how you ran the configure script, if I understand correctly.
Why was this question attached to a thread about Implicit Destination
I have a message in the vette directory labeled:
Message has implicit destination
The user whom sent it subscribes to the list. How do I resolve?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have a message in the vette directory labeled:
Message has implicit destination
The user whom sent it subscribes to the list. How do I resolve?
Thanks,
LDB
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Lawrence Bowie wrote:
I have a message in the vette directory labeled:
Do you mean the vette log?
Message has implicit destination
The user whom sent it subscribes to the list. How do I resolve?
The message was held for implicit destination. If it hasn't already
been acted upon by a
Bob Bales wrote:
What does it mean when a message is kocked back due to:
Cause: Message has implicit destination
It means that Privacy options...-Recipient
filters-require_explicit_destination is Yes and neither the list
posting address nor any acceptable_aliases were found in the To: or
Cc:
It also that some listserves won't respond when their address is listed
bcc: . It's a total pain that a sender who prefers addressing to lists of
bcc: addresses has to persuade the owner of some mailman lists to
reconfigure so as to accept posting to their list under bcc; the
alternative is
Hello
Sorry about the previous message. I just found the explanation of message
has implicit destination in the FAQ document.
Thanks anyway.
Joe
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
On Oct 11, 2004, at 2:05 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chad Leigh wrote:
Not related to my own installations of mailman, but I run a few lists
on an ISP I have an account at (for historical reasons). The lists
were originally majordomo lists and when they moved to Mailman the
hostname changed from
Not related to my own installations of mailman, but I run a few lists
on an ISP I have an account at (for historical reasons). The lists
were originally majordomo lists and when they moved to Mailman the
hostname changed from lists.domain.tld to mailman.domain.tld . And
then a forwarding
Chad Leigh wrote:
Not related to my own installations of mailman, but I run a few lists
on an ISP I have an account at (for historical reasons). The lists
were originally majordomo lists and when they moved to Mailman the
hostname changed from lists.domain.tld to mailman.domain.tld . And
Hello
I can i configure a list to receive messages with implicit destination,
so that they wont bounce for approval?
Is it enough to set require_explicit_destination to no? Apart from the
spam are there any other consequences to such a configuration?
Thanks
--
Mario Filipe
Mário Filipe wrote:
I can i configure a list to receive messages with implicit destination,
so that they wont bounce for approval?
Is it enough to set require_explicit_destination to no? Apart from the
spam are there any other consequences to such a configuration?
Yes, it should be enough to
On 9/14/2004 8:40, Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my case of a list with 300 members and 0 to 20 posts per day and a
web published address, the spam all gets caught in the non-member
filter. Only a couple of member posts have gotten caught in the
implicit destination filter.
I'm
John W. Baxter wrote:
Other adverse consequences depend on the population of list members.
One of them: we have some who seem to think that CC'ing to all their
friends and BCC'ing the list is somehow clever. What it does, of course, is
reveal a bunch of addresses to the list members...the
Can anyone explain this message:
List:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (no subject)
Reason: Message has implicit destination
Thanks.
Darren Young
Senior UNIX Administrator
University of Chicago
Graduate School of Business
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice:
On Jul 8, 2004, at 4:23 PM, Young, Darren wrote:
Can anyone explain this message:
List:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (no subject)
Reason: Message has implicit destination
See: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=all#1.9
-Jeff
On Jul 8, 2004, at 1:23 PM, Young, Darren wrote:
Can anyone explain this message:
List:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (no subject)
Reason: Message has implicit destination
Thanks.
Someone BCC'd the list instead of listing it on the To or CC lines.
It
At 3:23 PM -0500 2004-07-08, Young, Darren wrote:
Can anyone explain this message:
List:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (no subject)
Reason: Message has implicit destination
See http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.009.htp.
Thanks for your reply. Turns out that the problem is that mailman (at
least 2.0.x) silently converts the address to lower case before doing
the comparision. Using ib instead of IB made it work.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 17:47:41 +0900, Jim Tittsler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 3, 2004, at 02:50,
Greetings,
I've got a mailman list (version 2.0.14) behind a firewall. As a
result, anyone trying to send mail to that list sends it to an
external email address which is of the format:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That address then gets translated internally and forwards the mail to
the mailman list. The
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:26:28 -0500, Dan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 2, 2004, at 1:22 PM, Lonni J Friedman wrote:
The admin of the list isn't me, i just admin the physical box, and the
list admin is afraid of spam, so he wants to have tight control over
what can get posted to
What does implicit destination mean? I want these posts so what can I do as
administrator to let them through without approval.
What does implicit destination mean? How do I stop this. I want these
posts. There must be something I can do as administrator.
- Original Message -
From:
Implicit Destination means the list address is not present in either to
To: or CC: lines in a posting. It typically means that someone BCC'd
the list.
It's forbidden because it's a common spam technique..
- Mark
On Nov 13, 2003, at 3:18 AM, Rejean Proulx wrote:
What does implicit
For compatibility reasons, I created virtuser entries for all of my
lists. There are some old email addresses that people use to use for
the list functions. For example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has a virtuser of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it will require approval.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 12:26:31PM -0600, Terry Davis wrote:
For compatibility reasons, I created virtuser entries for all of my
lists. There are some old email addresses that people use to use
for the list functions. For example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] has
a virtuser of [EMAIL PROTECTED] If I
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 11:01:57AM +0700, Armanto Prasetyo wrote:
I have install Mailman Mailing List in my web site. But why, if member post
their message, it always wait for admin's approval? The reason is "Message
has implicit destination". What does this message means? My mailing list
Helo,
I have install Mailman Mailing List in my web site.
But why, if member post their message, it always wait for admin's approval? The
reason is "Message has implicit destination". What does this message means? My
mailing list name is mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your help,
ap.
Helo,
I have install Mailman Mailing List in my web site. But why, if member post
their message, it always wait for admin's approval? The reason is "Message
has implicit destination". What does this message means? My mailing list
name is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your help,
ap.
Hi
Can anyone point me at the right area to stop this happening;
I'm running Mailman V2.0.1 on a virtual host and have just set up a list
called "Test".
Having subscribed to the list, I then posted a test message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which is the explicit address for the list or I believe
it
"Douglas Munoz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I am running a very small, un-moderated list for the internal staff of my
| company. It is basically set up to allow non-members (job seekers) to post
| messages (resumes) to list members (HR).
|
| Every couple of days I will get notification that a
Douglas Munoz wrote:
I am running a very small, un-moderated list for the internal staff of my
company. It is basically set up to allow non-members (job seekers) to post
messages (resumes) to list members (HR).
Every couple of days I will get notification that a message requires
I am running a very small, un-moderated list for the internal staff of my
company. It is basically set up to allow non-members (job seekers) to post
messages (resumes) to list members (HR).
Every couple of days I will get notification that a message requires
administrative review. The reason
45 matches
Mail list logo
