Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2

2004-04-26 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Installed the new tarball, upgrade from 2.1.4 to 2.1.5, no problems so far. A few things I noticed (already present earlier, not 2.1.5 specific, but now I took note), should I report any of them via bugtracker or is this intentional? - all programs show up as "python" in top, would be nice to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2

2004-04-25 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Barry Warsaw wrote on Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:47:34 -0400: > If you upgrade you should do so only on a quiet system. I recommend > shutting down Mailman, your MTA, and your web server before doing the > upgrade. Please note any problems you have with the conversion scripts > (you may want to make ba

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2

2004-04-25 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Barry Warsaw wrote: > I've just uploaded Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2 (no, you never saw > rc1 :). Since there are some fairly significant changes with this > version, I felt it was necessary to put out a release candidate to > hopefully prompt some additional testing. Is there any chanc

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2

2004-04-24 Thread Barry Warsaw
I've just uploaded Mailman 2.1.5 release candidate 2 (no, you never saw rc1 :). Since there are some fairly significant changes with this version, I felt it was necessary to put out a release candidate to hopefully prompt some additional testing. If you're able to test the new version, that would