-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 16, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
Now, how much you might want to take from this and incorporate into
the pages at list.org/gnu.org, I would say that would be up to you.
If there are any other changes you'd like made to the
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Brad Knowles wrote:
Well, I updated the listinfo page for mailman-users in three places.
The first paragraph now reads:
This mailing list is for users and other parties interested
in the Mailman mailing list management system, as provided
At 9:38 AM -0800 12/18/06, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
Brad- I like those descriptions, although I might further clarify that
uesrs doesn't mean people sending mail through mailman, it means
people installing/managing/troubleshooting mailman.
Good point. I'll make that change.
Also, could we
Todd Zullinger writes:
I agree that if someone comes here with questions that are obviously
very dependent on some customization that their vendor has made that
they should be directed to check with the vendor. (Same goes for
users who need more basic help learning to use their OS of
At 11:46 PM -0500 12/15/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
There's two places where the mailing lists are described. One place
is on the web pages at list.org (and mirrored at gnu.org), and one is
within the Mailman listinfo description itself. Only Barry can
change the description at
Todd Zullinger writes:
Nothing wrong with that. It's why open source is so nice. I have the
choice to find vendors and projects that share more of my values than
others may. If FHS compliance is really important to you, you'll like
the Red Hat mailman packages.
The problem is that
On 06-12-14, at 22:40, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:59 PM -0400 12/13/06, Pierre Igot wrote:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?
req=showfile=faq01.021.htp
I am aware of this page and checked it before sending my request for
help. The page didn't provide any information that
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Todd Zullinger writes:
Nothing wrong with that. It's why open source is so nice. I have
the choice to find vendors and projects that share more of my
values than others may. If FHS compliance is really important to
you, you'll like the Red Hat mailman
At 8:53 AM -0400 12/15/06, Pierre Igot wrote:
IMPORTANT: Please note that the correct spelling for Mac OS X and
Mac OS X Server is with a space between the Mac and the OS.
Those of us who have a long history with Mac OS (like, back to the
days of the single floppy disk Mac Plus) will tend
At 8:40 PM -0600 12/15/06, Brad Knowles wrote:
That said, I will make an effort to find and correct all entries
where this is misspelled. I probably wrote most of them, so I have
the responsibility to make sure that they are correct.
Found and corrected, in a surprising number of places.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 15, 2006, at 9:40 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
There's two places where the mailing lists are described. One place
is on the web pages at list.org (and mirrored at gnu.org), and one is
within the Mailman listinfo description itself. Only Barry
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Pierre Igot wrote:
On 06-12-13, at 19:31, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Pierre Igot wrote:
I am running Mailman on an Xserve running Mac OS X Server 10.3.9. The
version of Mailman is the one included with Mac OS X Server 10.3.9.
(It's 2.1.2.)
See
On 06-12-14, at 03:51, Mark Sapiro wrote:
WRT to mailmanctl, apparently the Mailman qrunners were running at
some
time and then stopped. I don't know how they were started in the first
place or why they stopped. Perhaps a reboot of the server would have
started them again, perhaps not, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:18 AM, Terry Allen wrote:
I sent some docs through to Barry Warsaw a long time back,
but some oif the info contained in it are here:
Hi Terry, would you consider fleshing out OS X support on the Mailman
wiki? That's
[not speaking for Mark, Barry, or really anyone but me]
This is really the classic IT problem of unsupported configurations.
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Pierre Igot wrote:
But the reality was that, in all likelihood, this was a pretty basic
problem that had to do with Mailman itself,
On 06-12-14, at 13:18, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
But the reality was that, in all likelihood, this was a pretty basic
problem that had to do with Mailman itself, that it probably had
nothing to do with Apple's customizations, and that the most
efficient way to get help was probably to submit a
At 2:03 PM -0400 12/14/06, Pierre Igot wrote:
Believe it or not, I did check the FAQ before submitting my request.
I do believe it.
Try searching for all keywords message stuck qfiles/in or simply
for qfiles in the FAQ, for example. It doesn't return anything that
would have helped in
Brad Knowles wrote:
We can tell you what the Mailman-standard was is to start them, but
Apple has created their own code to manage this aspect of Mailman
operations and they haven't shared that with us.
Apple does provide the source code for their mailman packages. You
can browse it here:
Todd Zullinger writes:
Brad Knowles wrote:
We can tell you what the Mailman-standard was is to start them, but
Apple has created their own code to manage this aspect of Mailman
operations and they haven't shared that with us.
Apple does provide the source code for their mailman
At 5:32 PM -0500 12/14/06, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Apple does provide the source code for their mailman packages. You
can browse it here:
Even if they have made the source code available for everything
they've done with regards to Mailman (which includes all their
proprietary management
Pierre Igot wrote:
Believe it or not, I did check the FAQ before submitting my request.
Try searching for all keywords message stuck qfiles/in or simply
for qfiles in the FAQ, for example. It doesn't return anything that
would have helped in my case.
I believe you did check the FAQ, and
At 10:59 PM -0400 12/13/06, Pierre Igot wrote:
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.021.htp
I am aware of this page and checked it before sending my request for
help. The page didn't provide any information that addressed my
issue, as far as I could tell.
Okay, I
Brad Knowles wrote:
Even if they have made the source code available for everything
they've done with regards to Mailman (which includes all their
proprietary management tools), this is not the same thing as
contributing that code back to the Mailman project.
But what value would MacOSX
At 10:20 PM -0500 12/14/06, Todd Zullinger wrote:
But what value would MacOSX specific integrations be to the Mailman
project?
Well, if they fed their changes back to us, that would allow us to
incorporate that into future versions of the software, which would
then be trivially easy for
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:20 PM -0500 12/14/06, Todd Zullinger wrote:
But what value would MacOSX specific integrations be to the
Mailman project?
Well, if they fed their changes back to us, that would allow us to
incorporate that into future versions of the software, which would
then
Hi,
I am running Mailman on an Xserve running Mac OS X Server 10.3.9. The
version of Mailman is the one included with Mac OS X Server 10.3.9.
(It's 2.1.2.)
I've just started experimenting with mailing lists on this server
using Mailman. Things worked fine until I actually got to the stage
Pierre Igot wrote:
I am running Mailman on an Xserve running Mac OS X Server 10.3.9. The
version of Mailman is the one included with Mac OS X Server 10.3.9.
(It's 2.1.2.)
See
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.021.htp
I've just started experimenting with mailing
On 06-12-13, at 19:31, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Pierre Igot wrote:
I am running Mailman on an Xserve running Mac OS X Server 10.3.9. The
version of Mailman is the one included with Mac OS X Server 10.3.9.
(It's 2.1.2.)
See
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq01.021.htp
I
Pierre Igot wrote:
On 06-12-13, at 19:31, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Pierre Igot wrote:
I am running Mailman on an Xserve running Mac OS X Server 10.3.9. The
version of Mailman is the one included with Mac OS X Server 10.3.9.
(It's 2.1.2.)
See
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Pierre Igot wrote:
On 06-12-13, at 19:31, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Pierre Igot wrote:
I am running Mailman on an Xserve running Mac OS X Server 10.3.9. The
version of Mailman is the one included with Mac OS X Server 10.3.9.
(It's 2.1.2.)
See
This was posted on MacInTouch today; it might help the person who was
having trouble with Mailman on Mac OS X...
A new Apple KB article
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107906 offers a workaround
for a repair permissions problem with mailing lists on Mac OS X Server
(apparently
31 matches
Mail list logo
