Todd Zullinger writes:
> I agree that if someone comes here with questions that are obviously
> very dependent on some customization that their vendor has made that
> they should be directed to check with the vendor. (Same goes for
> users who need more basic help learning to use their OS of
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Todd Zullinger writes:
>
> > Nothing wrong with that. It's why open source is so nice. I have
> > the choice to find vendors and projects that share more of my
> > values than others may. If FHS compliance is really important to
> > you, you'll like the Red Hat mail
Todd Zullinger writes:
> Nothing wrong with that. It's why open source is so nice. I have the
> choice to find vendors and projects that share more of my values than
> others may. If FHS compliance is really important to you, you'll like
> the Red Hat mailman packages.
The problem is that
Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 10:20 PM -0500 12/14/06, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> But what value would MacOSX specific integrations be to the
>> Mailman project?
>
> Well, if they fed their changes back to us, that would allow us to
> incorporate that into future versions of the software, which woul
At 10:20 PM -0500 12/14/06, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> But what value would MacOSX specific integrations be to the Mailman
> project?
Well, if they fed their changes back to us, that would allow us to
incorporate that into future versions of the software, which would
then be trivially easy for t
Brad Knowles wrote:
> Even if they have made the source code available for everything
> they've done with regards to Mailman (which includes all their
> proprietary management tools), this is not the same thing as
> contributing that code back to the Mailman project.
But what value would MacOSX
Pierre Igot wrote:
>
>Believe it or not, I did check the FAQ before submitting my request.
>
>Try searching for all keywords "message stuck qfiles/in" or simply
>for "qfiles" in the FAQ, for example. It doesn't return anything that
>would have helped in my case.
I believe you did check the FAQ, a
At 5:32 PM -0500 12/14/06, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Apple does provide the source code for their mailman packages. You
> can browse it here:
Even if they have made the source code available for everything
they've done with regards to Mailman (which includes all their
proprietary management to
Todd Zullinger writes:
> Brad Knowles wrote:
> > We can tell you what the Mailman-standard was is to start them, but
> > Apple has created their own code to manage this aspect of Mailman
> > operations and they haven't shared that with us.
>
> Apple does provide the source code for their m
Brad Knowles wrote:
> We can tell you what the Mailman-standard was is to start them, but
> Apple has created their own code to manage this aspect of Mailman
> operations and they haven't shared that with us.
Apple does provide the source code for their mailman packages. You
can browse it here:
At 2:03 PM -0400 12/14/06, Pierre Igot wrote:
> Believe it or not, I did check the FAQ before submitting my request.
I do believe it.
> Try searching for all keywords "message stuck qfiles/in" or simply
> for "qfiles" in the FAQ, for example. It doesn't return anything that
> would have help
On 06-12-14, at 13:18, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>> But the reality was that, in all likelihood, this was a pretty basic
>> problem that had to do with Mailman itself, that it probably had
>> nothing to do with Apple's customizations, and that the most
>> efficient way to get help was probably to submi
[not speaking for Mark, Barry, or really anyone but me]
This is really the classic IT problem of unsupported configurations.
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Pierre Igot wrote:
> But the reality was that, in all likelihood, this was a pretty basic
> problem that had to do with Mailman itself
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:18 AM, Terry Allen wrote:
> I sent some docs through to Barry Warsaw a long time back,
> but some oif the info contained in it are here:
Hi Terry, would you consider fleshing out OS X support on the Mailman
wiki? That's
On 06-12-14, at 03:51, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> WRT to mailmanctl, apparently the Mailman qrunners were running at
> some
> time and then stopped. I don't know how they were started in the first
> place or why they stopped. Perhaps a reboot of the server would have
> started them again, perhaps not,
>Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>>Pierre Igot wrote:
>>
>>>On 06-12-13, at 19:31, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>>
Pierre Igot wrote:
>
> I am running Mailman on an Xserve running Mac OS X Server 10.3.9. The
> version of Mailman is the one included with Mac OS X Server 10.3.9.
> (It's 2.1.2.)
Mark Sapiro wrote:
>Pierre Igot wrote:
>
>>On 06-12-13, at 19:31, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>>> Pierre Igot wrote:
I am running Mailman on an Xserve running Mac OS X Server 10.3.9. The
version of Mailman is the one included with Mac OS X Server 10.3.9.
(It's 2.1.2.)
>>>
>>>
>>> See
17 matches
Mail list logo
