Re: [Mailman-Users] Messages remain in spool/mailman/in

2008-04-24 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On 24. April 2008 07:38:14 -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to know how to avoid such a situation. Would slices have helped here? No. Slicing would make things worse by increasing lock contention. OK, thanks. Since all the posts were for one list, and since the list

Re: [Mailman-Users] Messages remain in spool/mailman/in

2008-04-24 Thread Mark Sapiro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: | | --On 23. April 2008 18:28:44 -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | |>> Update: I just noticed that the number of messages in "in" is |>> decreasing. |>> Could it be that something just overwhelmed Mailman so that

Re: [Mailman-Users] Messages remain in spool/mailman/in

2008-04-24 Thread Mark Sapiro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: | | Ultrafunk Popcorn? That's one I'd never heard of until today! I just saw | that it isn't actively developed any more, otherwise I would've | suggested a bug report: it doesn properly rfc2047-encode headers ... | that's wh

[Mailman-Users] Messages remain in spool/mailman/in

2008-04-23 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
Hi, I just noticed a problem with our 2.1.9 installation. One of my colleagues complained that mails didn't go through to one of his lists. When I checked the logs, I found that sendmail handed the messages off to Mailman (some info redacted): 2008-04-23T15:14:23+02:00 lvr13.rrz.uni-koeln.de