Re: [Mailman-Users] New FAQ entry: broken autoresponders

2001-12-11 Thread Nigel Metheringham
Steve Lay wrote: > Is it possible to filter the envelope sender on a list? If so, > filtering senders like MAILER-DAEMON would catch groupwise (the > worst I've come across) and postmaster would catch one other that > I know of too. Ideally, this would be done by mailman itself. > Would these en

Re: [Mailman-Users] New FAQ entry: broken autoresponders

2001-12-10 Thread Steve Lay
>More simply, if the return path of a message is ever null ("<>"), it >should be bounced from wrapper post. Which is the same as what I went on to say I think... Mailman (post 1.1) does this bounce detection - presumably by looking at the envelope sender in the first instance. I think I'm argui

Re: [Mailman-Users] New FAQ entry: broken autoresponders

2001-12-07 Thread J C Lawrence
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:24:24 + Steve Lay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible to filter the envelope sender on a list? If so, > filtering senders like MAILER-DAEMON would catch groupwise (the > worst I've come across) and postmaster would catch one other that > I know of too. Ideally

Re: [Mailman-Users] New FAQ entry: broken autoresponders

2001-12-07 Thread Steve Lay
Good new FAQ page - this page will also be useful when liaising with postmasters of broken systems too. But is there more that mailman can do? I have been looking through several recent mail loop incidents and also examples of the more benign but still broken one-shot responders that end up on

[Mailman-Users] New FAQ entry: broken autoresponders

2001-12-03 Thread Greg Ward
3.6. What can I do about users with broken autoresponders? http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq03.006.htp -- Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users