Let me clarify my problem. When I edit my preferneces, now I was able to
get them to actually change - but they don't seem to affect actual list
behavior. The [ListName] is not sent, and mail always goes back to the
poster, notto the list. Can anyone illuminate me?
---
Alan McKay wrote:
>Well, I seem to have gotten it going again with some tweaks in my
>postfix. But that is still a mystery to me since it has worked fine
>like this for years.
It is possible that it has been marginal for some time and just some
little extra pushed it over the edge into a serio
Greetings,
I just changed a list from a bunch of admins to an admin and a
bunch of moderators, by following the instructions (pretty simple
actually). Just to be sure...:
1. Changed the site and creator passwords using shell commands
2. Logged in to list with soon to be stale admin pass
Alan McKay wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Those messages have been delivered to the MTA. If the list has just 3
>> eligible recipients, that looks backlogged but otherwise normal. If
>> the messages haven't been delibvered, check the MTA (mailq or
>> whatever).
>
>H
Well, I seem to have gotten it going again with some tweaks in my
postfix. But that is still a mystery to me since it has worked fine
like this for years.
Thanks for your ears!
Most notable below is my "new" IP vs my "old" IP. I changed ISPs a
good 3 years ago now and evidently forgot to updat
Hey folks,
I've been running a FreeBSD / Postfix / Mailman list server for some 7
or 8 years now. The last time I updated FreeBSD was about 3 years
ago so it is only at 6.0. That was also the last time I updated
Postfix and Mailman until this recent spat of problems which prompted
me to upgrad
Alan McKay wrote:
>
>I look in the Mailman logs dir. Nothing really onerous that I see.
>I look in smtp and see what looks like normal processing. e.g. one of
>my lists looks like it had a number of messages just a few minutes
>ago, but I have not seen them yet where normally I would expect to s
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Those messages have been delivered to the MTA. If the list has just 3
> eligible recipients, that looks backlogged but otherwise normal. If
> the messages haven't been delibvered, check the MTA (mailq or
> whatever).
Here it is almost 2 hours l
