Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Mailman e-mail delivery

2004-11-07 Thread Brenno J.S.A.A.F. de Winter
> Since you're working with a Debian package, you're probably better off > seeking help from Debian resources. Checkperms were ok indeed, so I'll head off to the Debian resources. Cheers, Brenno. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Mailman e-mail delivery

2004-11-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
Brenno J.S.A.A.F. de Winter wrote: > >Thanks for the pointer. I worked through it all, which I didn't solve >the issue and everything seemed normal. There is one thing different: >there is no user mailman. But that may be due to a difference between >RedHat and Debian. Renewed testing learned me th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Mailman e-mail delivery

2004-11-05 Thread Brenno J.S.A.A.F. de Winter
Hi Mark, Thanks for the pointer. I worked through it all, which I didn't solve the issue and everything seemed normal. There is one thing different: there is no user mailman. But that may be due to a difference between RedHat and Debian. Renewed testing learned me that there is really no logging d

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with Mailman e-mail delivery

2004-11-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
Brenno J.S.A.A.F. de Winterwrote: > >I have a new server with mailman installed on it. When testing the >MailMan-functionality I have the strangest thing. When I sent a mail to >the test list, it is delivered to the wrapper (according to the log). >But after that the e-mail seems to be archived in

[Mailman-Users] Problem with Mailman e-mail delivery

2004-11-05 Thread Brenno J.S.A.A.F. de Winter
Hi, I have a new server with mailman installed on it. When testing the MailMan-functionality I have the strangest thing. When I sent a mail to the test list, it is delivered to the wrapper (according to the log). But after that the e-mail seems to be archived in /dev/null, since there is no trace.