Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>
>You could filter messages discarding anything with the X-BeenThere header,
>this would prevent any message that came out of mailman from being processed
>again. OTOH I suspect that an announce-only list would be preferable.
MUAs generally do not copy X-BeenThere: headers
You could filter messages discarding anything with the X-BeenThere header,
this would prevent any message that came out of mailman from being processed
again. OTOH I suspect that an announce-only list would be preferable.
z!
--
Mailman-User
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>There is an option in Mailman for "full personalization" of list
>traffic. In that case, the list's address is removed from the visible
>headers entirely, and the user's name and address are substituted.
Full Personalization will not help in this case. When the list
T6 Webmaster writes:
> Is there a way to prevent the list email address appearing when a user
> chooses "Reply to All"?
Not in the way you state it. That's under control of the user's mail
program, and inclusion of the list's address is the logical outcome of
a command called "Reply to All".
T6 Webmaster wrote:
>
>Is there a way to prevent the list email address appearing when a user
>chooses "Reply to All"?
>
>
>
>It is not a problem with "Reply" - that goes to the poster - but Reply to
>All still sends to the entire list - not desirable in our situation.
There is no combination of
Group,
Is there a way to prevent the list email address appearing when a user
chooses "Reply to All"?
It is not a problem with "Reply" - that goes to the poster - but Reply to
All still sends to the entire list - not desirable in our situation.
John Zaleski
BSA Troop 6
Orlando, Florid
