Let's say I want no users on a mailing list from sitename.com. So, I
have a ban_list address of:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this the correct form of RegExp? If not, could someone give me a pointer?
Thanks in advance!
Best,
--Glenn
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little tempo
Glenn Sieb wrote:
>Let's say I want no users on a mailing list from sitename.com. So, I
>have a ban_list address of:
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Is this the correct form of RegExp?
Yes.
Note also that the ban_list applies to more things as of 2.1.7. From
NEWS:
- The list's ban_list now applies
Mark Sapiro said the following on 1/3/2006 9:39 PM:
> Yes.
>
> Note also that the ban_list applies to more things as of 2.1.7. From
> NEWS:
>
> - The list's ban_list now applies to address changes, admin mass
> subscribes and invites, and to confirmations/approvals of address
> chan
On 3 Jan 2006 at 21:45, Glenn Sieb wrote:
> Ok--then I guess on my 2.1.5 server, the moderators must have added
> people, without thinking, using the web interface--I'll have to upgrade
> to 2.1.7 as soon as I see the ht://dig patches come out!
I applied the ht://dig patches to 2.1.7 on my test b
Bryan Carbonnell wrote:
>I applied the ht://dig patches to 2.1.7 on my test box with no
>problems. IIRC there were just a few ofsets for a few hunks.
>
>So it appears to apply cleanly.
>
>
>
Agreed... the upgrade seemed to go very smoothly last night.
Best,
--Glenn
I have a question about the ban_list regex. In a reply on
Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:59:28 Mark Sapiro wrote
> So set Privacy options...->Sender filters->generic_nonmember_action
> to Accept so anyone can post and set Privacy options...->Subscription
> rules->ban_list to a regex that matches all addr
Barry Finkel wrote:
>I have a question about the ban_list regex. In a reply on
>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:59:28 Mark Sapiro wrote
>
>> So set Privacy options...->Sender filters->generic_nonmember_action
>> to Accept so anyone can post and set Privacy options...->Subscription
>> rules->ban_list to a
