On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:09:41 -0500
Pug Bainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Password sync'ing (should be trivial) 2) Archives via email
> (may be trivial, may not) 3) Duplicate emails (may not be
> possible)
> There are a lot of good things about Mailman, but #3 is a big
> hurdle that won't
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 16:37:08 -0500
Pug Bainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm finding that Mailman has some hangups that make it
> undeseriable.
As with any tool, there is a problem space it is attempting to
serve, and there are tradeoffs in its approach to that problem
space. I don't believ
Marc MERLIN ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something that sounded like:
> Can't you have the umbrella list sync its list of users from all the sub
> lists? (i.e. don't subscribe sub lists to the umbrella list, just have the
> master list update its list of users from the other ones, as in:
That i
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Pug Bainter wrote:
> There are a lot of good things about Mailman, but #3 is a big hurdle
> that won't be tollerated. After all, not everyone uses a UNIX system to
> read mail. There are a large number of people in the world on AOL,
> Hotmail, Yahoo, and MSN.
I don't use a Un
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 05:09:41PM -0500, Pug Bainter wrote:
> Marc MERLIN ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something that sounded like:
> > > I'm finding that Mailman has some hangups that make it undeseriable.
> > You have the source, choose which one you hate least :-)
>
> Well the issue here is that
Marc MERLIN ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something that sounded like:
> > I'm finding that Mailman has some hangups that make it undeseriable.
> You have the source, choose which one you hate least :-)
Well the issue here is that I don't think there is away around the
duplicate email stuff from watch
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:37:08PM -0500, Pug Bainter wrote:
> Marc MERLIN ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something that sounded like:
> > > That's a useful tool for recipients who have it available, but we're
> > > looking for a tool at the list management end that will handle it.
> > Mailman doesn't
Marc MERLIN ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something that sounded like:
> > That's a useful tool for recipients who have it available, but we're
> > looking for a tool at the list management end that will handle it.
> Mailman doesn't do that, sorry.
That's too bad because you could make majordono do i
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:14:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's a useful tool for recipients who have it available, but we're
> looking for a tool at the list management end that will handle it.
Mailman doesn't do that, sorry.
> First, because not all of our subscribers will be able
