On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Dan Mahoneywrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Jeff Groves wrote:
I think the two Received: headers could be enough considering the worm
probably has it's own SMTP engine. The way to answer this for sure is
to see if it is in the 'post' log.
Jan 27 22:55:10 2005
At 9:59 AM -0500 2005-02-08, Dan Mahoney, System Admin quoted Mark Sapiro:
As I said before, the information we really need in order to figure
this out would be the post as received by Mailman, not the one sent
out, but there's no way to get this from Mailman after the fact.
*that* is a
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 9:59 AM -0500 2005-02-08, Dan Mahoney, System Admin quoted Mark Sapiro:
As I said before, the information we really need in order to figure
this out would be the post as received by Mailman, not the one sent
out, but there's no way to get this from Mailman after the
Dan Mahoneywrote:
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005, Jeff Groves wrote:
I think the two Received: headers could be enough considering the worm
probably has it's own SMTP engine. The way to answer this for sure is
to see if it is in the 'post' log.
Jan 27 22:55:10 2005 (39139) post to vgc-announce from
