On 7/19/21 6:59 AM, Gregory Beyer wrote:
Hello, I have a feature request for MailMan.
Mailman 2.1 is end of life. No new features will be implemented. See
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-annou...@python.org/message/BLQ75U2RTMXKQDM4VUSZUQWSSQ2KE2R6/
and if you are interested in a
I can see the potential for that issue. But I don't see that as a reason for
not making it at least available to admins who might want it. Further, if a
user does does not want to provide complete, or any, name at all, with Mailman,
at least, I don't think that can be mitigated. OTOH, if one
On 7/19/2021 6:59 AM, Gregory Beyer wrote:
Would you please add to the
Privacy Options section, Membership Exposure, an option to show only the
member name, but keep their email address hidden from the member list, that
non-admin members may view? I'd like my members to see who, by name, is
Robert Carsey wrote:
> You know what would be super.. In Privacy Options > Sender Filters, the
> four fields titled "List of non-member addresses whose postings should
> be [accepted | held | rejected | discarded]" should be able to accept
> Mailman list names in addition to plain old e-mail addr
J C Lawrence wrote:
> Who said I can't access any other lists?
Exactly. I was going after single list admins doing this, not site wide
administrators (or even admins that have multiple lists). :)
--
H | "Life is the art of drawing without an eraser." - John Gardner
+---
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:58:28 -0700
Ashley M Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J C Lawrence wrote:
>> I would prefer it didn't log me out (actually that would both
>> annoy me and destroy the utility of the feature).
> As a site administrator, I can see this worthwhile. After all,
> hitting
J C Lawrence wrote:
> > That would mean having to log you out on that page (or upon
> > clicking on those links).
>
> I would prefer it didn't log me out (actually that would both annoy
> me and destroy the utility of the feature).
As a site administrator, I can see this worthwhile. After a
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:48:12 -0700
Ashley M Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would mean having to log you out on that page (or upon
> clicking on those links).
I would prefer it didn't log me out (actually that would both annoy
me and destroy the utility of the feature).
--
J C La
J C Lawrence wrote:
> > That last line is a link back to /admin/ - is that not
> > what you want?
>
> Nope. I want a link back to .../listinfo/ and/or .../admin/
That would mean having to log you out on that page (or upon clicking on those
links). When that page gets displayed, you're sti
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:30:35 -0700
Ashley M Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J C Lawrence wrote:
>> However there is no link back to the /admin or /listinfo pages,
>> which is unfortunate.
> Hrm, maybe it's just me then, but after I'm done with whatever
> administrative tasks needed to be
J C Lawrence wrote:
> However there is no link back to the /admin or /listinfo pages,
> which is unfortunate.
Hrm, maybe it's just me then, but after I'm done with whatever administrative
tasks needed to be done (/mailman/admindb/), I get a page back that looks like
this:
Database Updated
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001 20:35:27 -0700
Ashley M Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "J. Barnes" wrote:
>> When I login to the administrative mode for a mailing list and
>> click on "tend to pendingadministrative requests", after I click
>> the submit changes button, I'm at a dead-end type screen.
"J. Barnes" wrote:
> When I login to the administrative mode for a mailing list and click on
> "tend to pendingadministrative requests", after I click the submit changes
> button, I'm at a dead-end type screen. Shouldn't this screen have the
> standard set of links for Configuration Categories a
13 matches
Mail list logo
