Re: [Mailman-Users] Reject *to* non-subscriber

2007-10-12 Thread Mark Sapiro
glen martin wrote: > >Custom handlers look interesting, thanks for the pointer. Having read >the page it seems that to use my custom handler for just one list, in >all methods I have to hard-code a new handler chain in entirety. Do I >correctly understand that one can't add the new handler as a d

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reject *to* non-subscriber

2007-10-12 Thread glen martin
I take John's points well, and indeed had thought of those myself. In the case of this particular list, I think the small noncompliance is being done by accident rather than connivance, so bouncing the posts would seem to be a useful way to reinforce subscriber training. :) Custom handlers look

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reject *to* non-subscriber

2007-10-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
John W. Baxter wrote: >On 10/11/07 2:33 PM, "glen martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I run a private list where the list-members have decided they don't want >> non-subscribers on the threads at all. But occasionally one will forget >> and cross-post. I'd like to bounce subscriber messages w

Re: [Mailman-Users] Reject *to* non-subscriber

2007-10-11 Thread John W. Baxter
On 10/11/07 2:33 PM, "glen martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've seen several posts about restricting non-subscribers from posting. > This is a little different. > > I run a private list where the list-members have decided they don't want > non-subscribers on the threads at all. But occasion

[Mailman-Users] Reject *to* non-subscriber

2007-10-11 Thread glen martin
I've seen several posts about restricting non-subscribers from posting. This is a little different. I run a private list where the list-members have decided they don't want non-subscribers on the threads at all. But occasionally one will forget and cross-post. I'd like to bounce subscriber me