Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-30 Thread Mark Sapiro
Clare Redstone quoted me and wrote: > >>The Approved: here may or may not be needed. It is only to >ensure that the resent message doesn't get held a second time. If you edit >out the things that caused it to be held, you don't need the Approved: >. < > >I just checked what was happening again.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-30 Thread Clare Redstone
the original sender as "from." I'm there! Thanks for your help. Clare -----Original Message- From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] Sent: 29 December 2009 23:53 To: Clare Redstone; mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests Clare Re

Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-30 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2009-12-29 6:53 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Clare Redstone wrote: >> Thank you again for such a helpful reply. Any solutions getting Resent-To >> (Bounce?) to work through Outlook? > Try the drafts idea. There may actually be a way to directly resend a > message from outlook, but I know little abo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-29 Thread Mark Sapiro
Clare Redstone wrote: > >I might exceptionally see if I can edit and resend messages when I think >it's particularly worth it and the sender likely to be flummoxed by being >asked to clean and resend. I'm having trouble following the instructions >though. > >I use Outlook 2007 on Windows XP so don'

Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-29 Thread Clare Redstone
ompared with the amount of time I could spend tidying up digests and archives. Thank you again for such a helpful reply. Any solutions getting Resent-To (Bounce?) to work through Outlook? Clare -Original Message- From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] Sent: 29 December 2009 15:06 To: Cl

Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-29 Thread Clare Redstone
>>it was Yahoo Group Digest messages... I really like the way these digests work. You can click on a message in the summary at the top and it scrolls down to that message.<< Yes, that was the first thing I noticed, trying out the Mailman digest - that it doesn't do this, so takes a bit longer vie

Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-29 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2009-12-29 1:43 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Tanstaafl wrote: >> I don't recall where, but I have seen some digest lists that actually >> have Reply/Forward 'links' for each message in the digest in the >> included 'headers' of each individual message in the digest. Using these >> links creates a re

Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-29 Thread Mark Sapiro
Tanstaafl wrote: > >I don't recall where, but I have seen some digest lists that actually >have Reply/Forward 'links' for each message in the digest in the >included 'headers' of each individual message in the digest. Using these >links creates a reply identical to one that would be generated if th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-29 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2009-12-29, Mark Sapiro (m...@msapiro.net) wrote: > Also note that if the members subscribe to the MIME format digest (make > it the default), many MUAs allow opening an individual message from > the digest and replying to it alone. It might be easier to train your > users if they have this abil

Re: [Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-29 Thread Mark Sapiro
Clare Redstone wrote: > >I'm in the process of setting up Mailman for a discussion group of about 100 >members. From past experience, I know some people will prefer to have digest >but they'll also probably just hit the "reply" button without editing the >subject or deleting anything automatically

[Mailman-Users] Replying to digests

2009-12-29 Thread Clare Redstone
Hello, I'm in the process of setting up Mailman for a discussion group of about 100 members. From past experience, I know some people will prefer to have digest but they'll also probably just hit the "reply" button without editing the subject or deleting anything automatically included. I think