Chris Barnes wrote:
>
>I guess what I am asking is for a way to be MM to process a
>.procmailrc - specific to each list - before distributing to the list.
I think header_filter_rules is lacking one thing that would allow your
simply dropping your procmail recipes directly in, and that is the
fact
Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you want mailman to deal with it, you can use header_filter_rules
> to recognize the headers and act accordingly, but why not just delete
> the spam before it gets to mailman?
That would be fine for MailMan, but not for everyone else (MM exists on
the
Chris Barnes wrote:
>
>Hmm. I just got done searching the archives and am still not sure what
>to do. On our mail server (which also has Mailman installed) we have 3
>anti-spam packages installed (SpamAssassin, qsf, & Bogofilter). The
>combo of all three make for a very effective system.
>
>W
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> If you aren't already, DNSbl's to block connects from dynamic IPs, known
> infected networks, spammers, etc. We're using combined.njabl.org,
> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, and list.dsbl.org
In addition, I've found that greylisting the -admin, -join, -owner,
-request, an
Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:27 AM -0600 2005-11-04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I'm an AMD-64 Gentoo Linux, Postfix, Mailman server - does anyone
>> have any suggestions for a system wide anti-spam tool that
>> integrates well?
>
> There are some good things in the FAQ Wizar
At 10:27 AM -0600 2005-11-04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm an AMD-64 Gentoo Linux, Postfix, Mailman server - does anyone have any
> suggestions for a system wide anti-spam tool that integrates well?
There are some good things in the FAQ Wizard showing you how to
integrate postfix, am
Hi Kevin,
Where would you like the spam to be put instead of the hold directory?
If the spam is filtered to some other folder, there will still be
something which will need to be cleaned at some point. There's always the
"Discard
held messages older than this number of days" option in ma
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> All -
>
> Although Mailman does a great job blocking SPAM from my users, the daily
> task of purging all defered e-mails (SPAM 99.9% of the time) is growing
> weary.
>
> I'm an AMD-64 Gentoo Linux, Postfix, Mailman server - does anyone have
Hi Kevin,
I'm curious, how are you filtering spam - with a spam filtering rule
that matches a particular header and holds the message? If so, do you
have lists configured to send notifications for held messages? We found
that this of course generates backscatter ("your message has been he
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm an AMD-64 Gentoo Linux, Postfix, Mailman server - does anyone have any
> suggestions for a system wide anti-spam tool that integrates well?
If you aren't already, DNSbl's to block connects from dynamic IPs, known
infected networks, spammers, etc.
All -
Although Mailman does a great job blocking SPAM from my users, the daily
task of purging all defered e-mails (SPAM 99.9% of the time) is growing
weary.
I'm an AMD-64 Gentoo Linux, Postfix, Mailman server - does anyone have any
suggestions for a system wide anti-spam tool that integrates wel
11 matches
Mail list logo
