Everett Johnson wrote:
>Why is it normal for a bounce processor to be the sender when there are
>no bounces? This confuses some list members.
It is done because there are/used to be non-compliant MTAs that would
return bounces to the Sender: instead of the envelope sender. There
was an extensiv
On 2006-04-27 at 22:46-05 Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:40 AM -0500 2006-04-27, Neal Groothuis wrote:
>
> > Again from RFC 2822 3.6.2, the Sender: header should contain the
> > address of the agent responsible for transmitting the message,
> > meaning that a person who sends mai
It does not appear that Mailman modifies the "Sender:" field to comply
with RFC 2822. The list-bounces address is not the mailbox of the agent
responsible for transmitting the message, as required in section 3.6.2.
The mailbox of the agent responsible for the transmission of the
message would
At 10:40 AM -0500 2006-04-27, Neal Groothuis wrote:
> I would like to request that a feature be added in the next version of
> Mailman to allow a list administrator to disable rewriting of the
> "Sender:" header, or (better) for this behavior to be eliminated from
> Mailman altogether.
Neal Groothuis wrote:
>
>I would like to request that a feature be added in the next version of
>Mailman to allow a list administrator to disable rewriting of the
>"Sender:" header, or (better) for this behavior to be eliminated from
>Mailman altogether.
The best place to make this kind of reques
To reopen an old discussion:
I would like to request that a feature be added in the next version of
Mailman to allow a list administrator to disable rewriting of the
"Sender:" header, or (better) for this behavior to be eliminated from
Mailman altogether.
Rationale:
- Outlook treats the Sender
